Does an unusually quick peer review indicate rejection?

It is difficult to predict whether a short review time indicates rejection. I don't think there is any clear correlation between the time taken for review and its outcome. If a reviewer is quick, or is not tied up with other commitments at the time, it is possible to complete a review within a week's time.

Does a short review time for a manuscript indicate rejection?

Answer: If the status changed to "Ready for Decision" within a day, it is indeed an unusually quick review. Even rapid publication journals would take at least a week to complete the review process.

Is rejection common in the peer review process?

It is very common for papers to be rejected. Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

What percent of peer review submissions are rejected?

As you may have read in the article on desk rejection, depending on the journal, between 40%–75% of submitted manuscripts receive desk rejection.

What is a fast peer review?

Fast-track peer review prioritizes a manuscript and decreases its publication time. Not every journal offers this option, and those that do have differing qualifications, and even definitions, for fast tracking. Some define fast tracking as just fast review, while others define it as fast publishing.

On Peer Reviewing: "Accepting with Major Revisions" vs. "Reject"

How long should peer review take?

Typically, when a paper is considered for peer review, each round of peer review takes approximately 45-90 days. Desk decisions (usually rejections for reasons such as the manuscript not being a good fit for the journal) or acceptance post minor revision may happen in less time.

Is being a peer reviewer prestigious?

Journal editors select peer reviewers for their knowledge of a particular field. Thus peer reviewers are perceived as experts and being associated with prestigious journals as peer reviewer is considered an accomplishment for any researcher.

Why do peer reviewers decline to review?

Lack of time is the principal factor in the decision to decline. Reviewing should be formally recognised by academic institutions and journals should acknowledge reviewers' work.

Why do reviewers decline to review?

The most frequent reasons for declining to review were lack of time (46%) and lack of expertise (35%).

Why might a paper be rejected during the peer review process?

Such problems may include the following: – the paper describes a poorly conducted study; – the research conducted was inadequate; – the literature review is inadequate; – the paper has methodological problems; – the sample is problematic (i.e. too small in size, self-selected etc.)

What does peer rejection predict?

Childhood aggressive behavior and peer rejection are independently predictive of delinquency and conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive children who are also socially rejected tend to exhibit more severe behavior problems than do children who are either only aggressive or only rejected.

What causes peer rejection?

Children and adolescents may experience interpersonal rejection if they demonstrate shy, withdrawn, or anxious behavior or if they struggle with externalizing behavior such as aggression that may lead to a cycle of bullying followed by victimization (Killen et al., 2013; Rubin et al., 2006).

Why does peer review take so long?

There can be a number of reasons why a review may take longer than expected – workload (as noted above) is the most common. Reviewers will sometimes request extensions if they know that they have a particularly busy period coming up but still want to provide a review.

What is the most common reason for rejection of the manuscript?

Improper manuscript uploading in the journals' author center (this may add to the frustration of the Editor-in-Chief) Missing covering letter or with improper authors' affiliations. Improper formatting and language, grammatical lapses, and typographic errors.

Can a paper be rejected after peer review?

However, it's very common for papers to be rejected; studies have shown that around 21% of papers are rejected without review, while approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review.

How long does it take to get a desk rejection from a journal?

Desk rejection: this will usually come within a week or so of submitting your article. A desk rejection is where a member of the editorial team has 'prescreened' your manuscript, considering if it should be sent out to review or not.

Does under review mean sent to reviewers?

Under Review: This is the initial stage when your paper is being evaluated by peer reviewers. Reviewers assess the quality, validity, methodology, significance, and other aspects of your research. They provide feedback and recommendations to the journal's e.

Does reviewers assigned mean under review?

Answer: The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent out for review.

Why are peer reviewers not paid?

The authors termed this “a billion-dollar donation” to publishing companies. The main argument against paying reviewers is that, in a general sense, this work is already paid. It's one of a broad range of activities that are compensated by an academic salary. It's part of the job.

What does a reviewer look for during peer review?

The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews should not call the authors' qualifications into question. Instead, reviewers should elaborate on where the science or writing is lacking. Reviews should be unbiased, respectful, and constructive. Personal attacks that call an author's character into question should never be included in a peer review.

How accurate is peer review?

Peer-review is by no means perfect. It is itself subject to bias, as most things in research are. Evidence from a peer-reviewed article does not make it reliable, based only on that fact.

How are peer reviewers chosen?

A reviewer may be selected for their expertise in the topic of the study, but also for their general methodological expertise, or because they have been a reliable reviewer for the journal in the past.

How many reviewers usually see a paper springer?

It is common to use 2–3 peer reviewers per manuscript. Because it is always possible that some people may not be available or able to review, it is wise to target more than is required on each occasion (e.g. have five reviewers in mind and recruit three, then if one says no you have another two potentials).

Is peer review a skill?

Peer review is the process by which professionals in the field publish, it's how managers and co-workers provide feedback in the workplace, and it's a skill with practical application.