How can I speed up my peer review process?

Choose appropriate journals: Select journals that have a reputation for efficient and timely peer review. Look for journals that have a streamlined review process and a track record of timely publication. Conducting prior research on journal turnaround times can help you make informed decisions.

How can I speed up my peer review?

Recommend potential reviewers: Finding qualified reviewers can be one of the most time-consuming stages of the peer review process. Providing 3 to 5 reviewer recommendations may help reduce the Editor's time spent on finding qualified researchers to evaluate your manuscript.

How long should the peer review process take?

Typically, when a paper is considered for peer review, each round of peer review takes approximately 45-90 days. Desk decisions (usually rejections for reasons such as the manuscript not being a good fit for the journal) or acceptance post minor revision may happen in less time.

Why does peer review take so long?

However, reviewers are incredibly busy – they often have research, teaching and writing responsibilities not to mention other reviews (and that's before even thinking about a work-life balance). This means that it isn't always possible for them to get back to a review invitation immediately.

How can we improve peer review process?

We should consider distributing reviewer's invitations across the globe, involving more early-career researchers in the peer review, and give more credits to the reviewers. Also, the responsibility lies with their mentors and professors to provide guidelines on how to write and review a research paper.

How peer review works? From article submission to publishing

Why is peer review so difficult?

Often journals make peer review harder than it needs to be, either due to overly complex processes or lack of organization. From disorganized journal data to scattered communication, there are a lot of traps journals can fall into that complicate peer review.

What are the 5 key elements of peer review?

Faith, or F.A.I.T.H. in peer review depends on five core attributes: fairness in reviewing; appropriate expertise, iden- tifiable reviewers, timely reviews; and helpful critiques.

How long does the average journal review take?

On average, the length of time it takes an editor to process a paper submitted to their journal and send it out for peer review is 2-3 weeks.

How many hours does a peer reviewer spend reviewing a paper?

The length of time it takes to review depends on the paper, your availability, and your experience of reviewing. On average, reviewing a full-length journal article can take 2-5 hours.

What is a typical peer review process?

The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.

What are the five steps of the peer review process?

How many papers are rejected after peer review?

Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

How often should peer review meet?

Peer review is a key component of a health center's Quality Assurance/Improvement Program and is considered a QI assessment; therefore, health centers should complete peer review a minimum of quarterly to identify trends and address areas of risk.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews that make assumptions about the paper without providing specific feedback are not helpful to the author. Review comments should offer guidance to the authors on how they can broaden their research so it may contribute something to the field. The review comments should give the authors actionable feedback.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

Can peer review reject?

Inadequate data often leads to manuscript rejection during the peer review process, as it indicates that the data collected doesn't convincingly support the conclusions.

How much do peer reviewers get paid?

While ZipRecruiter is seeing hourly wages as high as $30.53 and as low as $10.34, the majority of Peer Reviewer wages currently range between $17.31 (25th percentile) to $22.36 (75th percentile) across the United States.

How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?

Reviewing three manuscripts per article published is not a hard job, but reviewing 15 manuscripts per article published, which could result in 75 reviews a year if you publish five articles, may be overwhelming.

Are peer reviewers compensated?

Peer reviewers get paid for reviewing books and conference papers, so why should journals be any different? Critics argue that payments to peer reviewers would simply be passed on in higher subscription fees or article processing charges, but all that does is perpetuate the low internal valuation of the service.

Why is my paper under review for so long?

There are several possible reasons for such a delay, e.g., overload of papers under review, difficulty in finding suitable reviewers, and reviewers taking longer than usual owing to their own constraints.

How long does it take to write a peer reviewed journal article?

Research Papers for a Journal Publication

On the low end, it takes 2 months, more commonly 6 to 12 months to write a research paper for publication in a journal. Then, you have to factor in the actual timeline from submission to publication.

How long does it take to publish a peer reviewed journal article?

Timeline and publication turnaround

The shortest turnaround time, especially with priority "hot topic" research, is about 9 weeks. However, it may take up to 20 (or more) weeks, depending on the amount of revision required and the processing speed of the editorial team.

What is the golden rule of peer review?

Journals have no way to coerce reviewers to return their critiques faster. To greatly shorten the time to publication, all actors in this altruistic network should abide by the Golden Rule of Reviewing: review for others as you would have others review for you.

What is the most important rule of peer review?

General comments to the authors

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

What do peer reviewers look for?

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.