How long does Elsevier peer review take?

Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within two months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is delayed a further expert opinion may be sought. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees for comment. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript.

How long does it take to hear back from a peer review?

In other words, how long does peer review take? Short answer: It takes up to about 3 months (studies have shown peer review typically takes 7–12 weeks), but there are a lot of variables to take into account.

How long should I wait for peer review?

Researchers should wait for 6-8 weeks before contacting a journal editor to inquire about the status of their submitted paper, according to advice from American Journal Experts.

Is everything on Elsevier peer-reviewed?

All articles in open access journals which are published by Elsevier have undergone peer review and upon acceptance are immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.

How long does it take for a peer-reviewed article to be published?

On average, it can take anywhere from several months to several years. However, a general estimate is around 6-12 months from initial submission to publication.

How peer review works? From article submission to publishing

Why does peer review take so long?

However, reviewers are incredibly busy – they often have research, teaching and writing responsibilities not to mention other reviews (and that's before even thinking about a work-life balance). This means that it isn't always possible for them to get back to a review invitation immediately.

Can an article be rejected after peer review?

However, it's very common for papers to be rejected; studies have shown that around 21% of papers are rejected without review, while approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review.

Is it difficult to publish in Elsevier?

But getting published in well-known and high-impact journals can be challenging. All authors feel disappointment when any reputed high-impact journal rejects their article. However, if this has happened to you, you are not alone. High-impact journals such as Elsevier are notorious for having a high rate of rejection.

How many reviewers usually see a paper in Elsevier?

Most papers receive feedback from three peer reviewers. Shorter papers, such as brief reports or current issues, may receive feedback from two peer reviewers. Some journal submissions such as commentaries and book reviews are reviewed by AJPM editors and do not undergo external peer review.

How much does Elsevier charge to publish a paper?

We offer a choice of journals with open access publishing charges ranging from $150 to $9,900. We will also consider requests for accommodations on a case by case basis for authors who are required to publish open access but do not have the financial means to do so.

How can I speed up my peer review process?

Choose the right journal: Selecting an appropriate journal that aligns with your research topic and scope can increase the chances of a faster review process. Some journals are known for their quicker turnaround times compared to others. Research the average review times and select journals accordingly.

How can I speed up my peer review?

Recommend potential reviewers: Finding qualified reviewers can be one of the most time-consuming stages of the peer review process. Providing 3 to 5 reviewer recommendations may help reduce the Editor's time spent on finding qualified researchers to evaluate your manuscript.

What is the rejection rate for peer review?

Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

What is the next step after peer review?

Next Steps

If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article.

How many reviewers are needed for peer review?

A minimum of two independent reviewers is normally required for every research article. The aims and scope of each journal will outline their peer review policy in detail. The reviewers will be asked to read and comment on your article.

What happens before peer review?

Step 1: Submission The first step in the peer review process begins with the submission of a research manuscript to a scholarly journal. Researchers should carefully select a journal that aligns with the scope and focus of their study.

What does under review mean Elsevier?

Answer: The status “under review” means that the manuscript has cleared admin check and is now with the peer reviewers.

How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?

Reviewing three manuscripts per article published is not a hard job, but reviewing 15 manuscripts per article published, which could result in 75 reviews a year if you publish five articles, may be overwhelming.

Is Elsevier reputable?

They're generally legitimate. The negative reviews and boycotts aren't about the quality of the journal, but are because of Elsevier's alleged high prices (see The Cost of Knowledge). Elsevier publishes some of the best journals in some fields, e.g. The Lancet and Cell.

What is the rejection rate for Elsevier?

When a manuscript is submitted to a high-quality scholarly journal, it goes through intense scrutiny — even before it's seen by the editor-in-chief and selected for peer review. At Elsevier, between 30 percent to 50 percent of articles don't even make it to the peer review process.

What is the Elsevier controversy?

Elsevier says it is investigating how one of its journals managed to publish a paper with patently absurd assertions about the genetic inheritance of personality traits. The paper, “Temperament gene inheritance,” appears this month in Meta Gene and was written by authors in Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

Is Taylor and Francis better than Elsevier?

Taylor and Francis doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings. Employees at Elsevier rate their Professional Development Score a /100, with Customer Support and Customer Success as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews should not call the authors' qualifications into question. Instead, reviewers should elaborate on where the science or writing is lacking. Reviews should be unbiased, respectful, and constructive. Personal attacks that call an author's character into question should never be included in a peer review.

What are the don'ts of peer review?

Be careful not to let your own opinions bias your review (for example, don't suggest that your peer completely rewrite the paper just because you don't agree with his/her point of view). Reread your comments before passing them on to your peer. Make sure all your comments make sense and are easy to follow.

Why can peer review be bad?

They will sometimes miss critical information in a paper or have personal biases when reviewing, causing dubious research to sometimes be published. Furthermore, another study shows that there may be a bias in favor of the institutions that the reviewers themselves are affiliated with.