How long does it take from editor to reviewer?

On average, the length of time it takes an editor to process a paper submitted to their journal and send it out for peer review is 2-3 weeks.

How long does editor review take?

Editorial Decisions

The handling Academic Editor or staff editor makes the final decision on each manuscript. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews.

How long does it take to hear back from reviewers?

A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks.

How long does a manuscript stay with editor?

It is perfectly normal for a submission to remain with the editor for over two weeks. The time taken for the different stages varies from journal to journal, but it is not uncommon for the journal system to show a “with editor” status for over a month after submission.

Is a reviewer considered an editor?

Reviewers have a much more limited role than editors. A reviewer can only view a manuscript that they have been specifically invited to review. They also cannot make a publication decision - they can only write a review and recommend the publication decision.

Editage – Should I thank the editor and reviewers for accepting my paper?

How many reviewers usually see a paper springer?

All research articles, and most other article types, published in Springer journals undergo peer review. This usually involves review by at least two independent, expert peer reviewers.

What is the difference between a reviewer and an editor?

Reviewers are subject matter experts who assess the content itself and provide detailed feedback, while Editors have a broader responsibility for managing the publication process, including selecting and coordinating reviewers, making publication decisions, and ensuring the content aligns with the publication's ...

What is the review process with editor?

With Editor:

At this stage, the editor completes an initial screening of the manuscript, and if he/she finds it suitable for the journal, it is sent for peer review. If the manuscript does not match the scope of the journal or does not meet the standards of the journal, it will be returned without review.

What is the status of with editor after review?

If the status of the manuscript shifted after the peer review to “with editor” or “editor assigned,” it means that the manuscript was returned to the Associate Editor, who will peruse reviewers' feedback and make a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief who makes the final decision (i.e., accepting, rejecting or ...

How often are manuscripts rejected?

About 20-30% of the manuscripts can very quickly be categorized as unsuitable or beyond the scope of the journal. The Editor-in-Chief has the discretion to reject the manuscript straight off even before sending it to the reviewers for reviewing.

How long does it take for a manuscript to be under review?

Short answer: It takes up to about 3 months (studies have shown peer review typically takes 7–12 weeks), but there are a lot of variables to take into account. These include the journal's internal processes and publication frequency, availability of peer reviewers, and other things out of your control.

Why is my paper under review for so long?

There are several possible reasons for such a delay, e.g., overload of papers under review, difficulty in finding suitable reviewers, and reviewers taking longer than usual owing to their own constraints.

How many reviewers usually see a paper?

A minimum of two independent reviewers is normally required for every research article. The aims and scope of each journal will outline their peer review policy in detail. The reviewers will be asked to read and comment on your article.

How long does it take for an editor to make an offer?

If an editor is really enthusiastic about your book, it could take just a couple of days (or even less!). Generally, however, editors need to present the book at their weekly editorial meeting and get their team onboard before they can make an offer. This can take time, sometimes a week or more.

How many reviewers does an editor typically send a manuscript to to review?

The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of reviewers is secured– commonly this is 2, but there is some variation between journals.

What to expect from an editor?

He or she won't write the story for you. Instead, your editor will help you produce the best story you can. Your editor will do this by pointing out opportunities for improvement. By the end of your time together, not only will your manuscript improve, but you should also improve as a storyteller.

What is next step after editor assigned?

If the Editor-in-Chief decides the paper is within the Journal's remit, the paper will be assigned to an Associate Editor. The Associate Editor selects and assigns peer reviewers. This can take some time dependent on the responsiveness and availability of the reviewers selected.

What is the next step after with editor?

If your manuscript status changed to "Seeking Expert Advice" after the "With Editor" stage, it is likely that the Associate editor is in the process of selecting suitable peer reviewers or the manuscript is under peer review, i.e., the status is likely to be in line with the typical "Under Review" status.

What does Elsevier status with editor mean?

Answer: The With Editor status may refer to the handling editor for your paper, known as either the Associate Editor (AE) or the Managing Editor (ME), or the Editor of the journal, known as the Editor-in-Chief (EIC).

What is awaiting editor decision before review?

The status, "Awaiting ED decision" most likely indicates that the manuscript is with the journal editor (likely editor-in-chief) for final checks before you receive the verdict.

Can editor accept a paper without review?

In cases where the work was felt to be of high quality, papers can sometimes be accepted without further review, but if there were serious criticisms, the Editors will consider them in making the decision.

What is decision in process after editor in Elsevier?

'Decision in Process' on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). A 'Decision in Process' soon after submission typically indicates that the manuscript is being desk-rejected.

How do editors find reviewers?

Check the references in the article

The reference section of a submitted article is an excellent place to start when looking for peer reviewers. Here, you're bound to find the names of other respected researchers working in the same field as the author of the article.

Who is above an editor?

A managing editor is a senior member of a newspaper or magazine's management team. They report to the publication's editor in chief and oversee several editors, associate editors and assistant editors.

Is it worth being a reviewer?

Becoming a reviewer is a great way to get involved with that group. This can give you the opportunity to build new connections for future collaborations. And being a regular reviewer may also be the first step to becoming a member of the journal's editorial board.