How long does peer review take?

Typically, when a paper is considered for peer review, each round of peer review takes approximately 45-90 days. Desk decisions (usually rejections for reasons such as the manuscript not being a good fit for the journal) or acceptance post minor revision may happen in less time.

Why is peer review taking so long?

In the majority of cases, the invited reviewers are able to respond within a few days. However, reviewers are incredibly busy – they often have research, teaching and writing responsibilities not to mention other reviews (and that's before even thinking about a work-life balance).

How long does it take to do a peer review?

Short answer: It takes up to about 3 months (studies have shown peer review typically takes 7–12 weeks), but there are a lot of variables to take into account. These include the journal's internal processes and publication frequency, availability of peer reviewers, and other things out of your control.

How many papers are rejected after peer review?

Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

Is peer review a quick process?

On an average, peer review takes anywhere between 1-3 months. It is rather unusual for the review process to be completed within a week. However, journals using ScholarOne Manuscripts often have a shorter peer review time.

How Long Does The Peer-Review Take | Why Does Peer Review Take So Long

How can I speed up my peer review process?

Choose appropriate journals: Select journals that have a reputation for efficient and timely peer review. Look for journals that have a streamlined review process and a track record of timely publication. Conducting prior research on journal turnaround times can help you make informed decisions.

What comes after peer review?

After a paper has been through the peer-review process and accepted by the journal, there are typically a few more steps remaining: The authors may need to make some final formatting changes to ensure that the manuscript is in the format required by the journal and the figures of of print quality.

Can a paper be accepted without peer review?

Answer: Many journals do not have a peer review process for certain article types, for instance, short communications or letters to the editor. These articles are usually published based on the editor's evaluation and decision.

What percent of peer review submissions are rejected?

As you may have read in the article on desk rejection, depending on the journal, between 40%–75% of submitted manuscripts receive desk rejection.

Why is peer review difficult?

A complicated process for everyone involved

Most of the time, reviewers are not paid for their time spent reviewing manuscripts, and are usually fellow academics who are expected to take time away from their regular job to be a reviewer.

What to expect during peer review?

The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.

What happens during peer review?

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.

How reliable is peer review?

Peer-review is by no means perfect. It is itself subject to bias, as most things in research are. Evidence from a peer-reviewed article does not make it reliable, based only on that fact.

How often should peer review meet?

Peer review is a key component of a health center's Quality Assurance/Improvement Program and is considered a QI assessment; therefore, health centers should complete peer review a minimum of quarterly to identify trends and address areas of risk.

Is peer review expensive?

The cost of peer review was estimated at $US1,272 per person, per year ($US1,015 for initial review and $US256 for re-review), or US$1.1–1.7 billion for the scientific community per year.

Why do peer reviewers decline to review?

Lack of time is the principal factor in the decision to decline. Reviewing should be formally recognised by academic institutions and journals should acknowledge reviewers' work.

How hard is it to get published in a peer-reviewed journal?

Writing a paper for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is a rewarding experience but a very difficult undertaking that requires years of experience, determination and patience.

Is being a peer reviewer prestigious?

Journal editors select peer reviewers for their knowledge of a particular field. Thus peer reviewers are perceived as experts and being associated with prestigious journals as peer reviewer is considered an accomplishment for any researcher.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews that make assumptions about the paper without providing specific feedback are not helpful to the author. Review comments should offer guidance to the authors on how they can broaden their research so it may contribute something to the field. The review comments should give the authors actionable feedback.

What is the final step in peer review?

Step 5: Decision Once the peer review is complete, the reviewers submit their reports to the editor. Based on the feedback received, the editor decides regarding the manuscript. The decision can fall into several categories, including: Acceptance: The manuscript is accepted for publication without any major revisions.

What are the 3 kinds of peer review?

The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

How do you win a peer review?

What are the 6 steps in the peer review process?

Who actually does the peer review?

The journal's editors send the article to several other scientists who work in the same field (i.e., the “peers” of peer review). Those reviewers provide feedback on the article and tell the editor whether or not they think the study is of high enough quality to be published.