How long does the peer review process take?

Typically, when a paper is considered for peer review, each round of peer review takes approximately 45-90 days. Desk decisions (usually rejections for reasons such as the manuscript not being a good fit for the journal) or acceptance post minor revision may happen in less time.

Is peer review a quick process?

A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks.

How long is a peer to peer review?

A study of 3,000 articles

It showed that peer review time in samples ranged from under 4 weeks to more than 3 months, with 10% having to wait even longer.

How can I speed up my peer review process?

Choose the right journal: Selecting an appropriate journal that aligns with your research topic and scope can increase the chances of a faster review process. Some journals are known for their quicker turnaround times compared to others. Research the average review times and select journals accordingly.

How long does the average journal review take?

On average, the length of time it takes an editor to process a paper submitted to their journal and send it out for peer review is 2-3 weeks.

How Long Does The Peer-Review Take | Why Does Peer Review Take So Long

Why does peer review take so long?

However, reviewers are incredibly busy – they often have research, teaching and writing responsibilities not to mention other reviews (and that's before even thinking about a work-life balance). This means that it isn't always possible for them to get back to a review invitation immediately.

What is the process of peer review?

The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.

Can peer review reject?

Inadequate data often leads to manuscript rejection during the peer review process, as it indicates that the data collected doesn't convincingly support the conclusions.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews should not call the authors' qualifications into question. Instead, reviewers should elaborate on where the science or writing is lacking. Reviews should be unbiased, respectful, and constructive. Personal attacks that call an author's character into question should never be included in a peer review.

What are the 6 steps in the peer review process?

How many papers are rejected after peer review?

Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

What comes after peer review?

Step 5: Decision Once the peer review is complete, the reviewers submit their reports to the editor. Based on the feedback received, the editor decides regarding the manuscript. The decision can fall into several categories, including: Acceptance: The manuscript is accepted for publication without any major revisions.

Why is peer review difficult?

They will sometimes miss critical information in a paper or have personal biases when reviewing, causing dubious research to sometimes be published. Furthermore, another study shows that there may be a bias in favor of the institutions that the reviewers themselves are affiliated with.

What are the 3 kinds of peer review?

The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.

What is the abuse of peer review?

Abuse of peer review

There are several ways to abuse the process of peer review. You can steal ideas and present them as your own, or produce an unjustly harsh review to block or at least slow down the publication of the ideas of a competitor.

Does under review mean accepted?

The "Under Review" status means that your application is being actively considered by the recruiting team and is in the process of being evaluated.

What is the golden rule of peer review?

Journals have no way to coerce reviewers to return their critiques faster. To greatly shorten the time to publication, all actors in this altruistic network should abide by the Golden Rule of Reviewing: review for others as you would have others review for you.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

What does a good peer review look like?

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

What is the most common type of peer review?

The most common type of peer review is single-blind (or single anonymized) review. Here, the names of the reviewers are not known by the author.

What percent of peer review submissions are rejected?

As you may have read in the article on desk rejection, depending on the journal, between 40%–75% of submitted manuscripts receive desk rejection.

What is the most important rule of peer review?

Everyone involved in the peer-review process must always act according to the highest ethical standards. Information received during the submission and peer-review process must not be used by anyone involved for their own or others' advantage or to disadvantage or discredit others.

What is the main purpose of peer review?

The primary goals of a peer review are to determine whether a scholarly work falls within the journal's scope, to check whether the research topic has been clearly formulated, and to decide if a suitable approach has been taken to address the scientific issues involved.

What should a peer review include?

Is peer review mandatory?

At present, peer review of firms undertaking statutory audit of listed firms is already compulsory.