How long should peer review take?

Typically, when a paper is considered for peer review, each round of peer review takes approximately 45-90 days. Desk decisions (usually rejections for reasons such as the manuscript not being a good fit for the journal) or acceptance post minor revision may happen in less time.

How much time is spent on peer review?

A study of 3,000 articles

A study by Huisman and Smits extracted data from more than 3,000 articles submitted to one website (SciRev). It showed that peer review time in samples ranged from under 4 weeks to more than 3 months, with 10% having to wait even longer.

How much time do you spend on a peer review?

There is no set recommendation for how long reviewing a manuscript should take. Although some reviewers may spend 8 or more hours reading the manuscript and writing a review [9], a study of a public health journal shows that completing a review takes 2.7 hours on average [10].

How can I speed up my peer review?

Recommend potential reviewers: Finding qualified reviewers can be one of the most time-consuming stages of the peer review process. Providing 3 to 5 reviewer recommendations may help reduce the Editor's time spent on finding qualified researchers to evaluate your manuscript.

Is peer review a quick process?

On an average, peer review takes anywhere between 1-3 months. It is rather unusual for the review process to be completed within a week. However, journals using ScholarOne Manuscripts often have a shorter peer review time.

How Long Does The Peer-Review Take | Why Does Peer Review Take So Long

Why does peer review take so long?

In the majority of cases, the invited reviewers are able to respond within a few days. However, reviewers are incredibly busy – they often have research, teaching and writing responsibilities not to mention other reviews (and that's before even thinking about a work-life balance).

What are the 4 steps to peer reviewing?

What makes a bad peer review?

Superficial readings that cause the reviewer to reject a study on the basis of flaws it doesn't really have. A tone of voice-arrogant, dismissive or downright cruel-that makes even reasonable criticisms sound like personal attacks. Such reviews can cause more than just hurt feelings.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews that make assumptions about the paper without providing specific feedback are not helpful to the author. Review comments should offer guidance to the authors on how they can broaden their research so it may contribute something to the field. The review comments should give the authors actionable feedback.

Can peer review reject?

It is very common for papers to be rejected. Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

What are the golden rules of peer review?

The golden rules

The identity of the reviewers must be kept confidential unless open peer review is used. Reviewers advise and make recommendations; editors make the decisions. Reviewers must assess manuscripts objectively and review the work, not the authors. Editors-in-chief must have full editorial independence.

How long should you wait for a review?

You want to give people enough time to be able to leave a detailed review (customers rate longer reviews as more helpful), without waiting so long that they lose interest. How long should you wait before sending your review request? Between 7 to 21 days, depending on the type of product the customer purchased.

What is a typical peer review process?

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether a manuscript should be published in their journal.

Should peer review be paid?

Peer review can last months or years in some cases. Paying peer reviewers can speed up the process and motivate reviewers to evaluate manuscripts more efficiently.

Is peer review expensive?

The cost of peer review was estimated at $US1,272 per person, per year ($US1,015 for initial review and $US256 for re-review), or US$1.1–1.7 billion for the scientific community per year.

Is peer review worth it?

Peer review is integral to ensuring that robust, high quality research is published. In essence, it's the independent assessment of a research paper by experts in that field. Its purpose is to evaluate a manuscript's quality and suitability for publication.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

What are the 5 key elements of peer review?

Faith, or F.A.I.T.H. in peer review depends on five core attributes: fairness in reviewing; appropriate expertise, iden- tifiable reviewers, timely reviews; and helpful critiques.

What is the most important rule of peer review?

General comments to the authors

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

Does peer review lead to bias?

Peer review is the major method used by the scientific community to evaluate manuscripts and decide what is suitable for publication. However, this process in its current design is not bulletproof and is prone to reviewer and editorial bias.

What are the 3 kinds of peer review?

The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.

What do peer reviewers look for?

Peer reviewers will advise editors by thoroughly checking the rationale and methodology, and will verify that the conclusions and statements made in the paper are well supported, so that the readers can understand your findings. This means that several revisions may be needed before your paper can be published.

What should a peer review include?

What is the most common type of peer review?

The most common type of peer review is single-blind (or single anonymized) review. Here, the names of the reviewers are not known by the author.

What is the next step after peer review?

Next Steps

If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article.