How many reviewers for a scoping review?

A scoping review requires at least two reviewers and, as with all systematic reviews, an a priori scoping review protocol must be developed prior to undertaking the review itself.

How many reviewers are required for scoping review?

Before conducting the review, it is important to consider the composition of the research team: scoping reviews are not conducted by a single individual. The team should include someone with content expertise and an individual with experience conducting scoping reviews.

How do you structure a scoping review?

A scoping review protocol should include a description of all the stages of the source selection process based on title and abstract examination as well as on full-text examination. It should be premised on the inclusion criteria and also explain the mechanisms for resolving disagreements among reviewers.

What is the protocol of scoping review?

The protocol is the plan or methodology of your scoping review. You need to develop your protocol at the beginning of the process, before you start your searches. You may refine your protocol as you progress through your review. The iterative nature of a scoping review may necessitate some changes.

What are the 5 stages of scoping review?

In an effort to provide guidance to authors undertaking scoping studies, Arksey and O'Malley [6] developed a six-stage methodological framework: identifying the research question, searching for relevant studies, selecting studies, charting the data, collating, summarizing, and reporting the results, and consulting with ...

Scoping reviews: an overview with examples

How long should a scoping review take?

How long does it take to complete a scoping review? The entire process--from creating a research question, through conducting the literature search, screening results, analyzing data, and writing a manuscript can take as long as 18 months.

How many articles should be included in a scoping review?

Upon independently reviewing a batch of 20 to 30 articles, the reviewers met to resolve any conflicts and to help ensure consistency between reviewers and with the research question and purpose (Levac et al., ²⁰¹⁰).

Is scoping review qualitative or quantitative?

Because scoping reviews seek to develop a comprehensive overview of the evidence rather than a quantitative or qualitative synthesis of data, it is not usually necessary to undertake methodological appraisal/risk of bias assessment of the sources included in a scoping review.

Can a scoping review be systematic?

It appears that it is generally accepted that the aim of a systematic review is to identify and retrieve evidence that is relevant to a particular question or questions. A scoping review is more likely to provide an overview or map of the available evidence; it might even act as a precursor to a systematic review.

What are the best journals for scoping reviews?

Journals that publish scoping review protocols include BMJ Open and Systematic Reviews, among others. Registries include the JBI Review Registry. You should consider registering and/or publishing your own Scoping Review Protocol once you've established your Plan.

What is the Prisma flowchart for scoping review?

The PRISMA flowchart can be used to document the sources you used in your review, and your selection and screening processes. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews includes a checklist of 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items to include when completing a scoping review.

How do you justify a scoping review?

What is the minimum number of peer reviewers?

A minimum of two independent reviewers is normally required for every research article. The aims and scope of each journal will outline their peer review policy in detail. The reviewers will be asked to read and comment on your article.

Do you need two reviewers for systematic review?

Using a second reviewer throughout the entire study screening process can increase the number of relevant studies identified for use in a systematic review. Systematic review performers should consider using a complete dual review process to ensure all relevant studies are included in their review.

How many reviewers should a systematic review have?

Consider appropriate databases, number of databases, publication date range, grey literature. Use at least 2 independent reviewers. Have the reviewers use the inclusion and exclusion criteria as the basis for their selections.

What are the disadvantages of scoping review?

One major disadvantage to the scoping review is that due to the broad nature of the review question, the findings may be similarly broad, requiring additional steps on the part of the authors to synthesize and draw useful conclusions from them.

Is scoping review better than systematic review?

Conclusions: Scoping reviews are a useful tool in the ever increasing arsenal of evidence synthesis approaches. Although conducted for different purposes compared to systematic reviews, scoping reviews still require rigorous and transparent methods in their conduct to ensure that the results are trustworthy.

Which is better scoping review or systematic review?

The key differences between the two review methods can be attributed to their differing purposes and aims. The purpose of a scoping review is to map the body of literature on a topic area. The purpose of a systematic review is to sum up the best available research on a specific question.

Can you include secondary research in a scoping review?

While searching multiple databases for systematic reviews and other relevant sources, many researchers ask, “Can you include a systematic review in a scoping review?” Since systematic reviews are typically considered secondary studies, it's not recommended to include them in a scoping review.

Does a scoping review have a research question?

Although the focus of scoping reviews is often broad, a clearly constructed question is still necessary. The Joanna Briggs Institute recommends the use of the PCC framework for scoping reviews, although other frameworks can also be used depending on the nature of the review.

Do scoping reviews have hypotheses?

Scoping reviews can be seen as a hypothesis-generating exercise, while systematic reviews can be hypothesis - testing. An important component of developing a standard methodology for scoping reviews involves creating reporting guidelines.

How many reviewers review a paper?

18 Thus, with a commonly used number of three reviewers assigned to each manuscript received, a journal with an 80% rejection rate will need 15 reviewers to complete the task in order to publish one article. 18 Figure 1 provides the shape of the series with two to five reviewers assigned per manuscript received.

How many reviewers peer reviewers typically review a manuscript?

Two reviewers provide a balanced perspective and help ensure the paper meets basic standards for publication. Three or more reviewers: This is often used for high-stakes publications, complex or controversial papers, or journals with a rigorous review process.

Do reviewers ask for raw data?

Peer reviewers also don't check raw data. Or, at least, they're not typically expected to do so. This would make the review process very cumbersome and even more time-consuming than it already can be. And it can take a while.

Do scoping reviews need ethical approval?

Because of the nature of scoping reviews, ethical approval is not required.