Is Frontiers peer review single blind?

Frontiers operates a single-blind model during the review process. This means the reviewers know who the authors are in order to offer a full assessment within the context of their research and to ensure they can avoid any potential competing interests in accepting a review invitation.

Is peer review single-blind?

Single-blind peer review is the traditional method of review. In it, reviewers know the identity of authors, but authors don't know the identity of reviewers. (In double-blind review, neither reviewers nor authors know who the other party is.

Are all Frontiers articles peer-reviewed?

All Frontiers articles are peer-reviewed, receive a DOI, are citable, published in PDF and HTML format, and submitted for indexing in relevant digital archives. More useful information about submitting: Author guidelines.

Should peer review be double-blind?

Double-blinded peer review, where neither the authors' nor peer reviewers' identities are shared with each other, is thought to be the fairest system, but there is evidence that it does not affect reviewer behavior or influence decisions.

Is Frontiers in predatory?

All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. Based on a series of information published here, we decided to include the Frontiers Media journals on the predatory publications list.

Single Blind or Double Blind Peer Review in Publishing?

How reputable is Frontiers?

Frontiers is accredited by and is a member of major publishing regulatory and ethical organizations, adhering to the highest quality standards and best ethical practices. These include COPE, OASPA - Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, and DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals.

What is the rejection rate for Frontiers?

Articles that pass rigorous peer review performed are accepted - articles that do not are rejected. As submissions have been increasing over the years, so have rejections, and our rejection rates range from 50% to 70% depending on the journal.

What are the disadvantages of single blind peer review?

Disadvantages. Even though it's the most widely used form of peer review, single blind isn't always looked upon in a positive light in the academic community. For example, reviewers could use the fact that they are anonymous as an opportunity to be unusually critical of authors.

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews that make assumptions about the paper without providing specific feedback are not helpful to the author. Review comments should offer guidance to the authors on how they can broaden their research so it may contribute something to the field. The review comments should give the authors actionable feedback.

Is single blind or double-blind better?

In the case of investigating the effects of a drug that cures Alzheimer's a double-blind study is beneficial compared to a single blind study. The participants are not aware if they received a placebo or a real drug, therefore their option on the treatment will less likely influence the outcome.

Are Frontiers predatory journals?

In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall, though Beall's list was taken offline two years later in a decision that remains controversial.

Is Frontiers a prestigious journal?

We're the 3rd most-cited publisher

Analysis of the world's 20 largest publishers by volume, ranked by average number of citations in 2022 received by articles published in 2019, 2020 and 2021 (Dimensions, 2023).

Is Frontiers review anonymous?

Frontiers operates a single anonymized model during the review process. This means the reviewers know who the authors are in order to offer a full assessment within the context of their research and to ensure they can avoid any potential competing interests in accepting a review invitation.

What are the 3 kinds of peer review?

The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.

What is the golden rule of peer review?

Journals have no way to coerce reviewers to return their critiques faster. To greatly shorten the time to publication, all actors in this altruistic network should abide by the Golden Rule of Reviewing: review for others as you would have others review for you.

What is simple blind peer review?

The single-blind peer review (peer review) is a system in which the authors do not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers themselves of the authors.

Can a paper be rejected after peer review?

However, it's very common for papers to be rejected; studies have shown that around 21% of papers are rejected without review, while approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review.

Is peer review in crisis?

As long as we continue to chug within the current system, we will continue to have a problem with peer review. There are too many journals. This structural problem is not as often recognized and discussed, but we just keep on birthing journals.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

Why is peer review blind?

Simply, in a blind review, the paper is sent with all trace of the author's names and affiliation removed. Traditional review simply sent the paper as submitted with the names and addresses intact. The idea is to remove any bias related to gender, institution or the reputation of authors.

What are the disadvantages of single blinding?

What are the benefits of a single-blind study?

Single-blind studies work in that those who participate in the trial don't know if they're getting the placebo or the real thing. With this “blind” idea to the experiment, there are fewer chances of errors. The participants can't doctor their results since they aren't sure if they're getting the real treatment or not.

How long does Frontiers review take?

Our efficient collaborative peer review means you'll get a decision on your manuscript in an average of 61 days.

How many reviewers usually see a paper Frontiers?

Most article types require at least two reviewers to complete a review. These reviewers can either be invited from the board of review editors or appropriately recruited among experts in the field. It is the prerogative of a handling editor to manage the reviewer recommendations of a manuscript.

Who is the target audience of Frontiers?

Frontiers' target audience – in terms of both authors and readers – includes ecologists, environmental scientists, and other professionals in allied disciplines, especially those with interests in applied, problem-oriented science.