Is Google Scholar good for literature review?

If used in systematic reviews for grey literature, we recommend that searches of article titles focus on the first 200 to 300 results. We conclude that whilst Google Scholar can find much grey literature and specific, known studies, it should not be used alone for systematic review searches.

Can you use Google Scholar for literature review?

Google Scholar is power research tool that if used properly can significantly reduce the writing time and produce a critical literature review. Individual Discussion on a variable in the literature review is critical part of the literature review section.

What are the disadvantages of using Google Scholar?

Disadvantages of Using Google Scholar

It's full- text versions of many items indexed are not available for free through on the web; however, many are accessible through the Library website. It has yet to reveal what criteria they are using to select "scholarly" material.

What is the best resource for scholarly literature reviews?

Academic journals: Academic journals are a great source of information for literature reviews. These journals publish peer-reviewed research papers, review articles, and other scholarly works on a variety of subjects. You can search for academic journals using databases such as JSTOR, Pubmed, and Google Scholar.

Is Google Scholar a reliable source of information?

It can be a research source, but should not be the only source you use. Google Scholar does not provide the criteria for what makes its results "scholarly". Results are often vary in quality and it is up to the researcher to determine which of the results are suitable for their purposes.

how to do a literature review using google scholar

Why not to use Google Scholar?

However, Google Scholar also has some drawbacks in terms of its citation and metrics. First, it does not have a clear or consistent method of counting and verifying citations, as it may include self-citations, duplicate citations, or inaccurate citations from low-quality sources.

Is Google Scholar a peer-reviewed source?

If you find articles in Google Scholar, you would have to look up the journal the article is published in to find out whether they use peer review or not. When using library databases, there are options to restrict to peer review, either from the main search page or usually in the left hand column of the results page.

How do you choose a source for a literature review?

Which is the most reliable source of information in your literature review?

Peer-reviewed journal articles are considered the best source of information for literature reviews, though other sources are often used. Peer review is the process by which other scholars evaluate the merits of an article before publication.

How do you find a good literature review?

Start by searching broadly. Literature for your review will typically be acquired through scholarly books, journal articles, and/or dissertations. Develop an understanding of what is out there, what terms are accurate and helpful, etc., and keep track of all of it with citation management tools.

What is Google Scholar best for?

Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. From one place, you can search across many disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions, from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities and other web sites.

What are the pros and cons of using Google Scholar?

It allows you to search multiple formats across multiple disciplines in one search. Cons: Google Scholar doesn't access everything in the library's subscription databases, especially the most current information. Not everything is peer-reviewed, nor can you search or filter by peer-review status.

What is the difference between PubMed and Google Scholar?

Broad Coverage: Google Scholar includes a wide range of academic disciplines, including biochemistry and biology, whereas PubMed is primarily focused on life sciences and biomedical research.

Is Google Scholar the best option for a full systematic literature review?

If used in systematic reviews for grey literature, we recommend that searches of article titles focus on the first 200 to 300 results. We conclude that whilst Google Scholar can find much grey literature and specific, known studies, it should not be used alone for systematic review searches.

How do I use Google Scholar for literature search?

Does Google Scholar contain peer-reviewed literature?

Use Google Scholar

Also keep in mind that while Google Scholar has an academic focus, not all of the results will be peer-reviewed journal articles! You'll have to use your judgment and evaluate the sources you find if you need to use peer-reviewed sources.

What are the 3 major sources of literature review?

Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Sources.

What is the 5 year rule for literature review?

A good rule of thumb for Currency is that medical, scientific, and technology resources should be published within the last 5 years to prevent the information from being out-of-date; for less time-sensitive topics like history or the humanities, resources published within the last 5-10 years are often acceptable.

What is a primary source of literature review?

Primary sources may include letters, manuscripts, diaries, journals, newspapers, speeches, interviews, memoirs, documents produced by government agencies such as Congress or the Office of the President, photographs, audio recordings, moving pictures or video recordings, research data, and objects or artifacts such as ...

How many sources are enough for your literature review?

As a very rough rule of thumb – you may choose 8-10 significant pieces (books and/or articles) for an 8,000 word dissertation, up to 20 major pieces of work for 12-15,000 words, and so on.

How many sources is good for a literature review?

The length and depth of your literature review depends on the length of your project. If you are writing a 10-page argument paper, you may have room to include 5-6 sources to review, because you will also be establishing your argument as well, but there's no hard equation for how many or how much.

How old should sources be in a literature review?

The Literature Review Process

Analyze and categorize the literature (skim the articles, especially the abstracts). Evaluate for currency: depending on your field, literature should be no older than 5-10 years but can include classic studies prior to this if they are relevant to your topic.

How do I filter Google Scholar to peer-reviewed?

Google Scholar does not provide a limiter for peer-reviewed journal articles. If your assignment requires the use of peer-reviewed articles or referreed journals, you need to ascertain whether the source (journal) is appropriate.

How is Google Scholar useful in evaluating a source?

Google Scholar includes a list of references under each source. Next to each paper list is "cited by" link. Clicking on this link shows Google's citation analysis-- all the pages pointing to the original one listed are displayed. Click on "cite" link for citations in MLA, APA, or Chicago style.

How does Google Scholar handle peer-reviewed materials?

Google Scholar does not discriminate between peer reviewed and non peer reviewed content, so it is up to you to systematically and critically evaluate the materials you find.