Is the science of reading proven?

Decades worth of research has shown that instruction based on the science of reading works, with 95% of students having the ability to read proficiently with evidence-based instruction (a dramatic leap from the current 35% of students that can read at NAEP Profiecent or higher level).

Is science of reading evidence based?

The science of reading. means using evidence gleaned from rigorous research to guide effective classroom practices (Reyna, 2004).

Is the science of reading not just phonics?

Journalists are increasingly recognizing that the “science of reading” extends beyond phonics to include building the knowledge that enables comprehension. But they need to get more specific about what that looks like.

What are the cons of the science of reading?

Con: The Science of Reading emphasizes rich, complex texts that may frustrate struggling readers. The Science of Reading promotes rich texts, not leveled readers. The idea is that you expose all kids to these kinds of books, passages, and stories. Not all children are ready for these types of texts.

What do Fountas and Pinnell say about the science of reading?

Fountas and Pinnell believe that all children need explicit instruction in phonics, reading, and writing. F&P resources support children's attention to every letter, sound, and word in order to read and write with accuracy, fluency, and understanding.

The Unbelievable Science of How We Read

What is the science of reading controversy?

The science of reading, while typically villainized for solely advocating phonics, is misrepresented as a phonics program, while really, it is a body of research that informs the most effective way to teach decoding and language comprehension.

Does open court follow the science of reading?

Open Court Reading gave me some of my weekends back, because everything you need to teach is right at your fingertips. I like that it's explicit and follows the science of reading.

Who is pushing the science of reading?

Kathy Hochul of New York announced a proposal to require schools to use “scientifically proven” reading curriculums by 2025, and to invest $10 million in retraining teachers. The effort sweeping the country is known as the science of reading movement.

What is the research behind the science of reading?

The science of reading is a body of research that incorporates insights and research from disciplines that include developmental psychology, educational psychology, cognitive science, and cognitive neuroscience.

What states are banning three cueing?

Leaders in eight states took action during the 2023 legislative session to include an outright ban on three-cueing. Florida, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin all banned the practice and required its elimination from school curricula.

Does science of reading use nonsense words?

This approach is grounded in DIBELS [2], an assessment of nonsense words, but many reading programs that are phonics-first and phonics-intensive now incorporate having students pronounce nonsense words and promote the programs as the “science of reading” and/or “structured literacy.”

What states have banned Balanced Literacy?

Louisiana banned the use of three-cuing in 2022. In North Carolina, the General Assembly also banned the use of “three-cuing.” Three-cuing is a feature of Balanced Literacy. As of last October, three-cuing has been banned in Arkansas, Indiana, Florida, Texas, Ohio, and Kansas.

Is the science of reading becoming too much of a good thing?

Too much of a good thing is a waste of time.

Science of reading advocates don't want this left to chance. As before, some children will not need all this instruction, but—it's thought—there is no harm in providing it. At worst, those children will gain additional practice with important skills.

Why so many American kids are struggling to read?

In short, children raised in poverty, those with limited proficiency in English, those from homes where the parents' reading levels and practices are low, and those with speech, language, and hearing handicaps are at increased risk of reading failure.

Is Orton-Gillingham based on the science of reading?

In conclusion, Orton Gillingham is an instructional approach firmly grounded in the science of reading. It emphasizes the importance of explicit instruction in phonics, decoding, and other foundational reading skills and is designed to help students develop the language processes needed for reading and writing.

What are the big 5 of science of reading?

Effective reading instruction incorporates five components including phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and reading comprehension.

Is the science of reading an intervention?

The Science of Reading Intervention Program features three components. Teachers generally teach the Word Recognition component the first half of the school year, followed by the language comprehension and assessment-based instruction components for the balance of the year. Each component may be purchased separately.

What is the science of reading and what is it not?

In general terms, the science of reading refers to the large body of research that reflects what we currently understand about how we learn to read. Some people refer to the science of reading as the skills necessary for reading as well as the challenges people face when learning to read.

How is science of reading different from balanced literacy?

There are two approaches to teaching reading that have dominated the early education sphere for over a century: the science of reading, which is rooted in systematic phonics instruction, and a balanced literacy approach rooted in whole language instruction.

Is Fountas and Pinnell research based?

The Research Base for Fountas & Pinnell Classroom™

Like other effective comprehensive systems, Fountas & Pinnell Classroom™ rests on a thorough and thoughtful examination of existing research. Data gathered from implementation of FPC demonstrates positive evidence of gains.

Why was phonics abandoned?

After several decades of so-called reading wars, where dubious theories led educators to abandon the phonics method in favor of a variety of divergent — and often unsuccessful — literacy learning techniques, a growing number of states and districts are right back where they started.

Why did schools move away from phonics?

But in general, most reading education combines phonics and whole language (see and say) approaches. Back in the day, there were these “reading wars” about the best way to teach reading. Fluent readers read by sight, they don't “sound out” words, which is why that approach dominated teaching.

Why is Fountas and Pinnell not good?

Thus: Fountas and Pinnell's approach to reading creates learning difficulties for which their curriculum then offers solutions. The rationale for the approach collapses if children are given sufficient opportunities to gain basic skills.

What is the best reading curriculum?

The Best Curriculum Should Include the 5 Reading Principles. Phonics, fluency, comprehension, spelling, and vocabulary are a must in the best reading curriculum. Make sure that the curriculum that you choose includes all these key principles as the foundation of the program.

Why guided reading doesn t work?

The problem is that guided reading is flawed from the beginning. Guided reading levels are arbitrary, they are not normed, and they cannot be relied upon for accuracy. The role of background knowledge and vocabulary isn't really considered.