Is Wikipedia a scholarly source?

Most academics agree that you shouldn't cite Wikipedia as a source in your academic writing, and universities often have rules against doing so. This is partly because of concerns about its reliability, and partly because it's a tertiary source.

Is Wikipedia a scholarly or popular source?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect.

Can you use Wikipedia as a credible source?

Because Wikipedia cannot be considered a reliable source, the use of Wikipedia is not accepted in many schools and universities in writing a formal paper, and some educational institutions have banned it as a primary source while others have limited its use to only a pointer to external sources.

Is it ever OK to cite Wikipedia?

In any case, you should not cite Wikipedia itself, but the source provided; you should certainly look up the source yourself before citing it. If there is no source cited, consider a different method of obtaining this information. All encyclopedias, whether traditional paper ones or online ones, have errors.

Can you Harvard reference Wikipedia?

To be made up of:

Title of article (in single quotation marks). Year that the site was published/last updated (in round brackets). Title of wiki site (in italics). Available at: URL.

Is Wikipedia a Credible Source?

Is it OK to cite an image from Wikipedia?

While not explicitly prohibiting citations of images, the Manual of Style for captions states "Unless relevant to the subject, do not credit the image author or copyright holder in the article." Wikipedia:Citing sources notes that "For an image or other media file, details of its origin and copyright status should ...

Is Wikipedia allowed in APA?

If you need to cite Wikipedia in APA format, be aware that it'll look slightly different from a conventional APA website citation. A Wikipedia citation in APA format includes the Wikipedia page title, version date, website, and URL specific to the entry version you're referencing.

Why you don't use Wikipedia as a source?

Wikipedia is not considered scholarly. Wikipedia acknowledges that its information is not properly vetted. The site has included hoaxes. People have created and edited pages to drive traffic to other websites.

Can you cite Britannica?

If the encyclopedia/dictionary's volume is available and the work does not arrange entries alphabetically, cite the volume after the article title, along with the abbreviation “vols.” Smith, John. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 8th ed., s.v. “Internet.” 20 vols. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2009.

Is Wikipedia a reliable source Reddit?

Wikipedia is reliable and has sources. In an official setting it's better to quote the sources, outside that it's a valid source.

What are two downsides to using Wikipedia?

What is the difference between Wikipedia and Britannica?

Wikipedia's Outline of knowledge includes many images (including maps, pictures, etc.), and supports the inclusion of images throughout. Britannica's Outline of Knowledge is currently broader (covering the overall spectrum of subjects more evenly) and it is more refined.

What is better than Wikipedia?

Encyclopedia Britannica Online

Wikipedia has grown to overshadow the encyclopedia in the Age of the Internet, but Britannica is still one of the most highly respected reference materials available. Yes, Britannica is a reliable source, and is certainly more reliable than Wikipedia.

What counts as scholarly sources?

Scholarly sources are written by academics and other experts and contribute to knowledge in a particular field by sharing new research findings, theories, analyses, insights, news, or summaries of current knowledge. Scholarly sources can be either primary or secondary research.

What sort of source is Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia

Wikipedia's main namespace is an encyclopedia and thus a tertiary source. Wikipedia avoids describing topics that never have been described before — doing otherwise qualifies as performing original research.

Is Britannica considered a scholarly source?

The online version of the Encyclopedia Britannica is a trusted source used by more than 4,755 universities worldwide, including Yale, Harvard and Oxford.

Is Wikipedia more accurate than Britannica?

A review of 42 science articles by subject experts for Nature found Wikipedia was as accurate as Britannica. A study by Oxford University of 22 English-language articles, funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, concluded it was more accurate than Britannica.

Why doesn t Britannica cite sources?

In short, because Encyclopædia Britannica is independently published and can make its own rules. If they want to publish an encyclopedia with no references, they're free to do so. And there's clearly demand for it, since it's one of the most popular and respected encyclopedias in the world.

Is Britannica considered a reliable source?

Trust Britannica Library as a reliable source with objective, fact-check, and unbiased content that is written by experts and vetted through rigorous editorial process. Take a look at our editorial process which serves as the backbone of our products, experiences, and content.

What is the most reliable source of information?

based on strong evidence.” Widely credible sources include: Scholarly, peer-reviewed articles and books. Trade or professional articles or books. Magazine articles, books and newspaper articles from well-established companies.

Does it matter who writes Wikipedia if so why?

Anyone can edit Wikipedia's text, references, and images. What is written is more important than who writes it. The content must conform with Wikipedia's policies, including being verifiable by published sources.

Can Wikipedia be edited by anyone?

Wikipedia is a wiki, meaning anyone can edit nearly any page and improve articles immediately. You do not need to register to do this, and anyone who has edited is known as a Wikipedian or editor. Small edits add up, and every editor can be proud to have made Wikipedia better for all.

How do you Harvard reference the same website twice?

Sometimes you must cite multiple web pages with different URLs from the same website. Information from individual pages on a website can be distinguished from one another by inserting a lower case letter after the year.

How do you cite a credible source?

How do you reference Harvard?