What are some issues with the discrepancy model and wait to fail methods?

The major concerns of this group are that IQ tests are a poor index of intelligence, that the IQ–discrepancy approach is a “wait-to-fail” model since students must perform poorly for years before achievement scores are sufficiently below their IQ scores, and that low achievement for many students is actually caused by ...

What is the problem with the discrepancy model?

To summarize, here are some concerns about the IQ-achievement discrepancy model: Assessments do not always discriminate between disabilities and the results of inadequate teaching. Students can be misidentified due to teacher or testing bias.

Why was the discrepancy model is sometimes referred to as the wait to fail model?

In this “wait-to-fail” model, struggling learners do not receive needed services as soon as their difficulties are evidenced, and instead they are set up to fail for several years until their achievement gap is wide enough for them to qualify for special education services.

Why has the discrepancy model fallen out of favor for the identification of a learning disability?

It can identify kids too late. Students with learning differences often struggle in the early grades. But they rarely show a large enough discrepancy on test scores to be “officially” identified with a learning difference.

What are the advantages of the discrepancy model?

Objective and Easy to Understand. The discrepancy model may have limitations, however, it has an advantage over alternative methods in that it is relatively simple. Also, it is an objective measurement and therefore can be applied evenly by many educators across even more students.

IQ/Achievement test and the discrepancy model and explaining the Independent Evaluation process

What are the disadvantages of the discrepancy model?

Cons: The discrepancy model can be rigid and inflexible, and may not accurately identify students who have learning difficulties that do not fit neatly into the model's criteria. The model relies heavily on standardized testing, which may not accurately capture a student's abilities or needs.

How is the discrepancy model different from patterns of strengths and weaknesses?

A pattern of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) is one approach for determining specific learning disabilities (SLD). As opposed to the old-school discrepancy model, which tells clinicians if a student is performing more poorly than expected, PSW seeks to determine why a student is performing more poorly.

What is a drawback to using a discrepancy approach to identifying?

A drawback to using a discrepancy approach to identify children with learning disabilities is: test scores may not represent actual ability.

What is a severe discrepancy model?

The Severe Discrepancy model allows educators to determine if a student's inadequate progress is commensurate with his or her cognition and whether the student is working to his or her potential.

Which states do not use the discrepancy model?

The federal regulation requiring a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement appears in the SLD classifica- tion criteria for 48 of the 50 states. Only two states do not have the discrepancy requirement in their state rules (IA and LA).

What is the wait to fail method?

Under the "wait-to-fail" model, some schools delay or avoid early interventions for struggling students until their academic difficulties become pronounced or until they fall significantly behind their peers.

What does the discrepancy model focus on the difference between?

The second method, the Discrepancy model, uses tests to determine if a significant discrepancy or difference exists between an intelligence (IQ) test and academic tests and performance (Marchant, n.d.).

What are the challenges in using an RTI model?

Major challenges to implementation of an RTI model are decisions about selecting and monitoring research-based interventions that are matched to students and implemented with fidelity and appropriate intensity, frequency, and duration.

What is the rationale for replacing the discrepancy model with RTI?

RTI or 'Response To Intervention' is a new approach to the identification of a learning disability which is intended to alleviate the problems associated with the discrepancy model. With RTI, there is no need to formally evaluate cognitive abilities or academic achievement.

What is the discrepancy model and response to intervention?

The RTI model utilizes evidence- based data. The Discrepancy Model is a more traditional method used to identify a learning disability through cognitive and academic achievement testing. RTI focuses on the student's inability to respond to interventions and/or instruction within the classroom setting.

What is the discrepancy model typically defined as quizlet?

The discrepancy model utilizes a difference between a student's intellectual ability and his or her achievement with which to identify learning disabilities. An intelligence test is used to measure a student's performance on tasks related to reasoning, memory, comprehension, and ability to learn academic skills.

What is a major difference between the IQ discrepancy model and the RTI model?

The pros of the RTI model are that teachers do not wait until a child is failing before doing something different than general education, like they often did under the discrepancy model. RTI is a much more proactive, preventative model. Many schools begin RTI services as early as pre-school and kindergarten.

What is the discrepancy model for identifying dyslexia?

The revised discrepancy method described in this study can be used by researchers to identify students in their studies who have dyslexia and that most researchers might agree are prototypical examples of dyslexia (i.e., low reading ability, higher cognitive ability, and a difference of more than 1.0 standard deviation ...

What is the severe discrepancy formula?

That formula requires you to compare the discrepancy between your child's achievement and ability test scores (using a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15) to “the standard criterion which is the product of 1.5 multiplied by the standard deviation of the distribution of computed differences of students taking ...

What is one of the problems with using a discrepancy approach to identifying children with learning disabilities?

What is a drawback to using a discrepancy approach to identifying children with learning disabilities? Test scores don't represent actual performance.

How do teachers identify struggling students?

Which problem recognition involves a discrepancy that only one brand can solve?

Selective problem recognition involves a discrepancy that only one brand can solve.

What is a learning disability according to the discrepancy model?

The area of the discrepancy indicates the area of the learning disability. For example, if a student's IQ is 90, and his/her Reading achievement tests' standardized scores fell at 75 or under, it can be concluded that a disability in reading is present.

How does the discrepancy model determines whether or not a child should receive special education services based on what?

Standardized tests of ability and achievement are often used. If a student's achievement scores are sufficiently below his ability scores, it indicates that the student has the severe discrepancy required for special education eligibility under this model.

What is the discrepancy model of a needs assessment?

Three models of needs assessment are described along with examples of each. The discrepancy model evaluates gaps between expectations of experts and the outcomes of the target population. The marketing model evaluates the fit between the consumer's desires and the ability of agencies to deliver services.