What are the ethics of peer review?

If the reviewer has any conflicts of interest, he or she should declare and decline the request to review. Reviewers should avoid requesting citations of their own work for personal gain. The reviewer should avoid disparaging personal remarks. Do not blame, but criticize the authors to strengthen their manuscript.

Which of the following is an ethical duty of peer reviewers?

Peer reviewers have a responsibility to: Help authors improve their work and help editors make a decision, Write Comments to the Authors that are clear, specific, and constructive, AND. Support comments with evidence (citations or supporting arguments), so that authors and editors understand the basis of the comments.

What are the ethics of reviewing?

Reviewers should judge objectively the quality of the research reported, give fair, frank and constructive criticism and refrain from personal criticism of the authors. Reviewers' judgements should be explained and supported so that authors can understand the basis of the comments and judgements.

What are the principles of peer review?

The peer review process should be fair, objective and impartial. Appropriate steps to prevent and manage real and perceived conflicts of interests must be taken. See the points outlined in COPE's Core Practices for further principles.

How can we make peer review more fair and ethical?

Disclosing all conflict of interest, maintaining confidentiality, attributing proper credit to all reviewers, providing constructive criticism and displaying courtesy are key components of ethical peer review. Peer review assesses the science behind the research study and manuscript.

Peer Review Ethics

What is an ethical dilemma in peer-reviewed articles?

An ethical dilemma is a situation of making a choice between two or more alternatives. An agent is in unpleasant and difficult situation because he/she often needs to make a choice between ethical and unethical alternatives, and when it comes to the ethical alternatives, he/she should choose the best one.

What are the 5 key elements of peer review?

Faith, or F.A.I.T.H. in peer review depends on five core attributes: fairness in reviewing; appropriate expertise, iden- tifiable reviewers, timely reviews; and helpful critiques.

What are the three main purposes of a peer review?

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication.

What is the gold standard for peer review?

The peer review is the key process to evaluate and validate the research that increase the overall quality of the journal.. Superficial and poor quality peer reviewing process does not identify the misconduct and ethical issues raised by the research. Peer review system is the gold standard to review an article.

What is the most appropriate of a peer review process?

Peer review is the independent assessment of your research paper by experts in your field. The purpose of peer review is to evaluate the paper's quality and suitability for publication. As well as peer review acting as a form of quality control for academic journals, it is a very useful source of feedback for you.

Why is ethical peer review important?

Peer reviewers play an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The peer review process depends to a large extent on the trust and willing participation of the scholarly community and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically.

What are the 5 ethical standards for ethics?

Moral Principles

Reviewing these ethical principles which are at the foundation of the guidelines often helps to clarify the issues involved in a given situation. The five principles, autonomy, justice, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fidelity are each absolute truths in and of themselves.

What are the 7 principle of ethics?

In summary, integrity, respect, responsibility, fairness, compassion, courage, and wisdom are the seven principles of ethical decision-making.

What is the code of ethics for peers?

Peer Support Specialists will not practice, condone, facilitate or collaborate in any form of discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, race, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, religion, national origin, marital status, political belief, disability, or any other preference or personal ...

What are the responsibilities of a peer reviewer?

A reviewer should provide suggestions and recommendations for revisions, identify additional work needed or necessary for consideration, and/or make clarifications that would enhance the quality of the manuscript.

What are the roles and responsibilities of peer review?

The purpose of peer review is not to demonstrate the reviewer's proficiency in identifying flaws. Reviewers have the responsibility to identify strengths and provide constructive comments to help the author resolve weaknesses in the work. A reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the author.

What makes a quality peer review?

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

What is code peer review standards?

Review fewer than 400 lines of code at a time

In practice, a review of 200-400 LOC over 60 to 90 minutes should yield 70-90% defect discovery. So, if 10 defects existed in the code, a properly conducted review would find between seven and nine of them.

How valuable is peer review?

Studies have shown that even strong writers benefit from the process of peer review: students report that they learn as much or more from identifying and articulating weaknesses in a peer's paper as from incorporating peers' feedback into their own work.

What are the disadvantages of peer review?

What should a peer review include?

What are the five steps of the peer review process?

What are the 7 peer review tips?

What are the 4 main ethical dilemmas?

Ethical dilemmas can be divided according to the types of obligations that are in conflict with each other. For example, Rushworth Kidder suggests that four patterns of conflict can be discerned: "truth versus loyalty, individual versus community, short term versus long term, and justice versus virtue".

What are the ethical issues in research journals?