What are the rules for peer reviewers?

The golden rules The identity of the reviewers must be kept confidential unless open peer review is used. Reviewers advise and make recommendations; editors make the decisions. Reviewers must assess manuscripts objectively and review the work, not the authors. Editors-in-chief must have full editorial independence.

What are some ethical guidelines for peer reviewers?

The reviewer's comments and conclusions should be objective and free from any personal or professional biases. The contents should be considered based on the facts that are being presented, and comments should be based solely on the paper's originality, quality, and scientific merits.

What are the criteria for peer review?

Bear in mind that the main factors you should provide advice on are: The originality, presentation, and relevance of the manuscript's subject matter to the readership of the journal. The accuracy and validity of the methodology, and whether the conclusions are appropriately supported.

What are the don'ts of peer review?

Be careful not to let your own opinions bias your review (for example, don't suggest that your peer completely rewrite the paper just because you don't agree with his/her point of view). Reread your comments before passing them on to your peer. Make sure all your comments make sense and are easy to follow.

What is the peer review policy?

The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.

What It Means to Be a Peer Reviewer

What are the 5 key elements of peer review?

Faith, or F.A.I.T.H. in peer review depends on five core attributes: fairness in reviewing; appropriate expertise, iden- tifiable reviewers, timely reviews; and helpful critiques.

What are the 3 kinds of peer review?

The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

What is the gold standard for peer review?

The peer review is the key process to evaluate and validate the research that increase the overall quality of the journal.. Superficial and poor quality peer reviewing process does not identify the misconduct and ethical issues raised by the research. Peer review system is the gold standard to review an article.

Can anyone write a peer review?

Anyone can submit a manuscript to a peer reviewed journal. The challenge that face persons without training in scientific writing through, for example, a PhD, is that the manuscript is probably far more likely to be rejected because of poor writing or other mistakes.

What are the roles and responsibilities of a reviewer?

A reviewer should provide suggestions and recommendations for revisions, identify additional work needed or necessary for consideration, and/or make clarifications that would enhance the quality of the manuscript.

What is the code of ethics for peers?

Peer Support Specialists will not practice, condone, facilitate or collaborate in any form of discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, race, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, religion, national origin, marital status, political belief, disability, or any other preference or personal ...

How do you avoid bias in a peer review?

While increasing transparency is one way to reduce bias, another approach is double-blind peer review. A study suggests that early career researchers tend to prefer double-blind peer review as it can reduce bias against authors with less experience, female authors, or authors from minority groups.

What are the 4 main ethical guidelines?

The 4 main ethical principles, that is beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, are defined and explained. Informed consent, truth-telling, and confidentiality spring from the principle of autonomy, and each of them is discussed.

What is code peer review standards?

Review fewer than 400 lines of code at a time

In practice, a review of 200-400 LOC over 60 to 90 minutes should yield 70-90% defect discovery. So, if 10 defects existed in the code, a properly conducted review would find between seven and nine of them.

What is true of a good peer review?

A good review will provide written, sufficiently thorough, well-documented and constructive feedback for the authors. Even if the submission is rejected, reviewer feedback is intended to help the authors improve the paper specifically and strengthen the overall academic, investigative process for future endeavours.

How credible is peer review?

Peer reviewed articles are often considered the most reliable and reputable sources in that field of study. Peer reviewed articles have undergone review (hence the "peer-review") by fellow experts in that field, as well as an editorial review process.

What makes a strong peer review?

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

What do reviewers look for in peer review?

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.

What are three key questions peer reviewers ask?

What are the three main aims of peer review?

The aims of peer review are to validate the quality of research in terms of accuracy, to allocate research funding, for example deciding if a grant should be awarded to a research body, and to suggest amendments or improvements before research is published.

Should peer reviews be anonymous?

The anonymity of the reviewers is intended to make it easier for them to give full and honest feedback on an article, without fearing that the author will hold this against them.

How long should peer reviews be?

Unhelpful review reports – reviews that are a single sentence or paragraph are unhelpful to authors or editors. A normal review report should be two to three pages in length, sometimes longer. (Read how to write a review report.)

How do you facilitate a peer review?

What are the 6 steps in the peer review process?