What happened to the Harvard affirmative action case?

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Harvard that, by a vote of 6–2, reversed the lower court ruling. In writing the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts held that affirmative action in college admissions is unconstitutional.

What was the outcome of the Harvard affirmative action case?

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. University of North Carolina (UNC) and ruled in that the race-conscious admissions policies of Harvard and the University of North Carolina (UNC) are unconstitutional.

What is the latest decision on affirmative action?

U.S. Supreme Court Ends Affirmative Action in Higher Education: An Overview and Practical Next Steps for Employers. On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision addressing the legality of race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions programs in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc.

Was Grutter v Bollinger overturned?

In 2023, the Supreme Court effectively overruled Grutter v. Bollinger in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, finding that affirmative action in student admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

How does Harvard respond to the Supreme Court decision?

"We write today to reaffirm the fundamental principle that deep and transformative teaching, learning, and research depend upon a community comprising people of many backgrounds, perspectives, and lived experiences," Harvard's leadership said. "That principle is as true and important today as it was yesterday."

Harvard students ‘devastated’ after Supreme Court affirmative action ruling

Did Harvard win the affirmative action case?

Harvard, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court held that race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions processes violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. With its companion case, Students for Fair Admissions v.

What happened in the Harvard case?

Today, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. The Court held that Harvard College's admissions system does not comply with the principles of the equal protection clause embodied in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

What is the affirmative action lawsuit against Harvard?

SFFA filed separate lawsuits against Harvard and UNC, arguing that their race-based admissions programs violate, re- spectively, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pro- tection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Did Harvard overrule Grutter?

President and Fellows of Harvard College (SFFA), the Supreme Court held that affirmative action programs designed to comply with the precedent set in Grutter v. Bollinger were unlawful. Yet the Court nowhere said that it was overruling Grutter and, in fact, relied on Grutter as authority.

What was the Supreme Court opinion on affirmative action?

The Supreme Court ruled in a 237-page opinion that race-conscious admissions are unconstitutional in cases involving Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Do universities still use affirmative action?

The court's 6-3 ruling in June prohibits all colleges in the country from using race as a consideration in admissions. California's public universities have not used affirmative action for almost 30 years, but some of the state's selective private colleges, and many out-of-state public universities, have relied on ...

Is affirmative action still in practice?

At the end of its term, the Supreme Court upended established equal protection law with its decision in SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC, effectively eliminating the use of affirmative action in college admissions.

What is affirmative action UK?

Affirmative action would not be permitted in the UK. In terms of its closest UK equivalent, positive action, there is no requirement for UK employers to use it but, as mentioned, doing so can provide employers with an effective means of increasing DEI and tackling inequality in their organisation.

What race has the highest chance of getting into Harvard?

At Harvard, an Asian candidate in the eighth highest academic decile had 5.1% chance of admittance, compared to 7.5% for white, 22.9% for Hispanic, and 44.5% for black applicants, per the brief.

What happened to affirmative action after the Bakke case?

The practical effect of Bakke was that most affirmative action programs continued without change. Questions about whether the Bakke case was merely a plurality opinion or binding precedent were addressed in 2003 when the court upheld Powell's position in the majority opinion of Grutter v. Bollinger.

Why did the Supreme Court rule against Harvard and UNC?

The court ruled that both programs violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution and are therefore unlawful. The vote was 6-3 in the UNC case and 6-2 in the Harvard case, in which liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was recused.

How many students does Harvard reject?

What Percentage of Early Action Applicants Does Harvard Typically Deny? While the percentage of students Harvard denies each Early Action cycle can vary, for the Class of 2028, 7.7% were rejected outright. The previous year, for the Class of 2027, 9.5% of applicants were denied admission.

How many students did Harvard accept?

Harvard University: Acceptance Rates & Statistics

Harvard University received 7,921 applications to the Class of 2028 in the early round, accepting 692 for a rate of 9 percent. They accepted 722 or 7.56 percent of the 9,553 early applicants to the Class of 2027.

Is Yale affirmative action?

Yale University Equal Opportunity Statement

University policy is committed to affirmative action under law in employment of women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other covered veterans.

Who is suing Harvard and UNC?

Students for Fair Admissions, led by long-time affirmative action critic Edward Blum, sued both Harvard and UNC, and ask the Supreme Court to overrule its prior decisions and hold that the consideration of race as part of a holistic college admissions process in order to achieve a diverse student body violates the ...

Does MIT follow affirmative action?

The Institute's Affirmative Action Serious Search policy is a means both to further its commitment to equal opportunity and to fulfill its legal obligations of affirmative action. MIT's policy on nondiscrimination is at Section 9.3 and its policy on non-retaliation is at Section 9.7.

In what ways did the Supreme Court weaken affirmative action laws?

In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023), the Supreme Court majority ruled that race-based affirmative action in college admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, with concurrences highlighting race-based affirmative action's violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

When was the Harvard scandal?

The 2012 Harvard cheating scandal involved approximately 125 Harvard University students who were investigated for cheating on the take-home final examination of the spring 2012 edition of Government 1310: "Introduction to Congress". Harvard announced the investigation publicly on August 30, 2012.

What was the Supreme Court decision on Harvard and UNC?

21-707, holding that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard and UNC violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. As described below, the immediate impact of this decision is largely confined to higher education.