What is one criticism of a learning theory explanation of attachment 3 marks?

Another critique of the learning theory is its overemphasis on the role of food in attachment. Conflicting evidence, such as Harlow's study, argues that comfort might play a more significant role than food in attachment formation.

What are two major criticisms of attachment theory one of them has to do with?

Critics contend that assuming an infant must form a single bond is damaging to the relationship between infants and other potential caregivers in their life. Others take issue with the idea that unless the attachment is formed by age two, a person is doomed to have an insecure attachment style forever.

What is the learning theory explanation of attachment 4 marks?

Suggested Answer: The learning theory of attachment explains how children become attached to their mother (or parents) through the process of classical conditioning and operant conditioning. Children 'learn' to attach to their mother by associating their mother with food, and the pleasure they receive from being fed.

How is the learning theory of attachment reductionist?

However, this theory is reductionist as it focuses on basic processes rather than complex emotional mechanisms which may play a role in infant attachment. In conjunction to this, the theory is mostly founded on animal research and therefore cannot be fully generalised to human behaviour.

What is the learning theory of attachment a03?

The learning theory of attachment proposes that all behavior is learned rather than an innate biological behavior, as children are born blank slates. According to classical conditioning, food (UCS) produces pleasure (UCR). The child associates food and the mother together.

Learning Theory of Attachment | AQA Psychology

What is one criticism of a learning theory explanation of attachment?

Another critique of the learning theory is its overemphasis on the role of food in attachment. Conflicting evidence, such as Harlow's study, argues that comfort might play a more significant role than food in attachment formation.

What is the learning theory as an explanation of attachment?

The learning theory of attachment is a behaviourist explanation that suggests that attachments develop through classical and/or operant conditioning. It is sometimes referred to as a cupboard love theory, as the infant attaches to the caregiver who provides the food.

Why did Bowlby reject learning theory as an explanation of attachment?

He rejected learning theory as an explanation for attachment because "were it true, an infant of a year or two should take readily to whomever feeds him and this is clearly not the case" (1988).

Is the learning theory of attachment Nomothetic?

Schaffer's stages of attachment theory takes a nomothetic approach as it proposes a general law for child development. However, such theories are inflexible and do not apply to all children in all cultures.

What is the difference between learning theory and Bowlby's theory?

Bowlby believed that attachments were formed in order to aid survival. Concepts such as monotropy and social releasers support this innate theory of attachment. The learning theory not only ignores the complexity of human attachment, it also ignored biological factors.

What is the learning theory of attachment and Bowlby?

This theory proposes that the emotional and social development of an infant is profoundly shaped by their relationship with their primary caregivers. Bowlby's theory is rooted in the belief that infants are biologically wired to form attachments, a mechanism that serves as a survival strategy.

What are some limitations and criticisms of the use of animals in attachment research?

A main weakness of animal studies is that animals have a different physiology to humans. This means that any studies on animals cannot be accurately related to humans, making them invalid. For example, humans do not express immediate imprinting on the first person they see, unlike animals such as ducks and dogs.

What are the key points of attachment theory?

The central theme of attachment theory is that primary caregivers who are available and responsive to an infant's needs allow the child to develop a sense of security. The infant learns that the caregiver is dependable, which creates a secure base for the child to then explore the world.

Which of the following is a criticism of attachment theory?

Which of the following is a major criticism of attachment theory? It overstates the mother's influence and understates the child's influence on the quality of attachment.

What are the negative effects of attachment theory?

Effects of insecure attachment

Children who have attachment issues can have difficulty forming healthy relationships when they grow up. This may be because their experiences have taught them to believe that other people are unreliable or untrustworthy (Bowlby, 1997)¹⁵.

What are limitations of attachment theory?

Limitations of Attachment Theory and its Measures. Although attachment theory defines a parent–child bond as emotional, its assumptions largely focus on survival behaviors, and its most prominent assessment tool, the SSP, focuses entirely on infant behaviors during a mild stressful situation.

Why is attachment theory outdated?

And there is also much research that suggests that a person's attachment style and behavior is different in their professional relationships, in their friendships, and with their love matches and, therefore, debunks the all-encompassing nature of attachment theory.

Is the attachment theory outdated?

Attachment theory is decades old, but the past three years have seen the theory explode in popularity. Over 2021 and 2022, Levine and Heller's book spent weeks on the New York Times best-seller list, as well as becoming a staple on Amazon's top 200 books.

What is meant by the term attachment psychology 2 marks?

Attachment is an emotional tie or bond between two people, usually a mother and a child. The relationship is reciprocal (shared), which means it is a two-way relationship.

What is the criticism of Bowlby attachment?

Some critics have argued that Bowlby's theory is overly focused on the mother-child relationship and doesn't account for the role of other caregivers or social factors in attachment. Additionally, some have questioned the universality of the theory, as attachment patterns may differ across cultures and contexts.

Why Harlow's study undermines the learning theory explanation of attachment?

Learning theory assumes that an infant attaches because it learns to associate the carer with food. However, Harlow's study showed that infant rhesus monkeys chose to attach to the cloth 'mother', in other words, for contact comfort, rather than to a caregiver that provided food.

What did Bowlby argue about attachment?

Bowlby suggests that attachment takes place during a critical period. It is suggested that if a child does not form an attachment before the critical period (2.5 years) attachment will not occur. (Bowlby later proposed a sensitive period of up to 5 years.) (IWM) provides a template for future attachments.

What are the positives of learning theory?

These principles provide different frameworks that teachers can use to adapt to students' diverse learning styles and academic needs. In addition to helping students absorb the information being taught, learning theories can also help teachers manage students' behavior.

What is a major criticism of learning theories?

The correct answer is (d) they do not pay enough attention to cognitions. This applies only to some learning theories, specifically the behaviorist theories.

What are the criticisms of learning theories?

The main criticisms of social learning theories concern the extent to which social interactions influence behaviour. Critics argue that these theories tend to reject genetic factors as significant determinants of behaviour: the classic nature versus nurture debate (Bouchard et al.