What is one weakness of the observation method used by Bandura?

For example, in the Bandura study, children do not usually see an adult behave aggressively towards a toy. This is a weakness as it is difficult to generalise the results to explain real life situations when the experiment is not very true to life.

What are the weaknesses of the Bandura study?

Bandura's study is low in ecological validity. It is not normal for children to see an adult attacking a toy and saying things like “Sock him on the nose!” Another problem is that Bobo Dolls are made to be hit. The children may have believed the experimenter wanted them to attack the Bobo Doll with the mallet.

What was the weakness of the Bobo doll experiment?

What are two ethical concerns of Bandura's study?

Bandura's study on aggression and the Bobo doll raises ethical concerns about exposing children to dangerous tools and potential violent behavior. Bandura evaluated aggression levels before the study, but there were issues with relying on parents and teachers for information.

What was unethical about the Bobo doll experiment?

One limitation of Bandura's Bobo Doll experiment is that it's unethical it has ethical issues because it used very young children as subjects. Bandura hypothesized that learning could happen through observation, and the results supported this.

Social Learning Theory: Bandura’s Bobo Beatdown Experiments

What are the criticisms of Bandura's theory?

Child behaviour and development theorists criticized Bandura's classical theory, arguing that it ignores autonomic nervous system responses and biological factors. According to book theories, some behaviours, like affinity toward people and responses, are partly inherited, not only learned.

Why was Bandura unethical?

Bandura's research holds ethical issues: The experiment conductued was unethical in terms of protection from harm as it exposes the children to frightening and possibly novel aggression. It can be considered morally wrong because the children were encouraged to be aggressive, which is clearly not appropriate.

Was the Bobo doll experiment valid?

Example Two: Bandura's Bobo Doll experiments

Weak Evaluation: Bandura's experiment took place in an unnatural environment and so its results lack ecological validity. This makes his conclusions about learning to be aggressive through observation invalid.

What are the 4 main ethical dilemmas?

Ethical dilemmas can be divided according to the types of obligations that are in conflict with each other. For example, Rushworth Kidder suggests that four patterns of conflict can be discerned: "truth versus loyalty, individual versus community, short term versus long term, and justice versus virtue".

What are the ethical issues of Bandura et al?

The most obvious ethical concern is the "undue stress or harm" caused to the children by watching adults act in a violent manner. Since the goal of the study was to get the children to show aggressive behaviour, one has to wonder if this will have a long-term effect on the children.

What are some other limitations of the Bobo doll experiment?

Lacked ecological validity, as although the setting was realistic, the actions were not. The adult either deliberately acted aggressive or subdued towards a bobo doll. As the doll was placed in the room where they were observed, they may have thought they were supposed to reproduce the behaviour they just observed.

What are the strengths of Bandura's Bobo doll study?

The strengths of Bandura's study are that it was a controlled laboratory experiment, which used a standardised procedure and has been successfully replicated. However, it's uncertain whether the imitation was caused only due to the novelty of the Bobo doll and whether it had a long-term effect on children's behaviour.

What is the reliability and validity of the Bobo doll experiment?

HOWEVER, the research is very short term and contrived making it artificial and unrealistic, which leads us to question the reliability and validity of the research. The doll lacks mundane realism (ie it can not be generalised to the real world), and it doesn't represent everyday aggression.

What are the pros and cons of Bandura's theory?

Pros: Provides insight into how people learn from others and provides ideas for including effective elements into your scenarios. Cons: Not a model for how everyone might behave, more of a guide that can predict behaviour.

What is a weakness of social learning theory?

A weakness of this theory is that much of the experiments used to test it only show short-term effects. Therefore, it is difficult to state if observation of aggressive role models, for example, means that aggressive behaviour will continue in the long term, and therefore the real-life application of findings is poor.

What are the limitations of the social cognitive theory Bandura?

What 3 factors cause ethical dilemmas?

However, research undertaken by McLaverty confirms that “many of us face an endless stream of ethical dilemmas at work”. The vast majority of those dilemmas are not related to corruption per se, but fall into one of three areas: competing interests, misaligned incentives, or clashing cultures.

What are the 3 types of ethical dilemma?

Ethical dilemmas can arise from various circumstances. Rushworth Kidder, founder of the US-based Institute for Global Ethics, recognises four types of ethical dilemma: short-term versus long-term, individual versus community, truth versus loyalty and justice versus mercy.

What are the three types of dilemmas?

What is Bandura's theory?

Social learning theory, proposed by Albert Bandura, emphasizes the importance of observing, modeling, and imitating the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others. Social learning theory considers how both environmental and cognitive factors interact to influence human learning and behavior.

Why is the BoBo doll experiment controversial?

The BoBo doll experiment, conducted by Albert Bandura in 1961, is considered unethical by today's standards because it involved exposing children to aggressive behavior.

Why does this Boo Boo doll experiment can be unethical to today's standard?

The 3.04 standard states that psychologists take reasonable steps to avoid harming their research participants. Since the procedure in the Bobo doll experiment transmitted aggressive behavior onto children, it can be seen as a harmful procedure.

Did Bandura get consent?

Informed consent: Bandura did get informed consent from the children's parents. Deception: There was not much deception, although the children were obviously unaware about the nature of this experiment. Confidentiality: The children's identities were not publicised.

What are the strengths and weaknesses of social learning theory?

Another strength is that it allows for different ways of learning. A person can learn through observation or direct experiences. However, the theory does not account for how we develop a wide range of behavior based on thoughts and feelings.

What is the most critical aspect of Bandura's theory?

Observational learning is a major component of Bandura's social learning theory. He also emphasized that four conditions were necessary in any form of observing and modeling behavior: attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation.