What makes a good or bad peer review?

Your review should be clear, constructive and consistent. Clarity is important because authors will not be able to respond to your concerns if they don't fully understand what they are. Reviews are most helpful if they don't just criticise, but also make constructive suggestions for how concerns may be resolved.

What makes a bad peer review?

The bad peer-review

It is a peer-review that (1) fails to identify major flaws, to communicate criticism to authors to improve their manuscript and to inform fraud to the editor, and (2) does not review all manuscript sections including references and illustrations.

What are the qualities of a good peer review?

Five core elements of peer review are identified. Constitutive elements of scholarly peer review include: fairness in critical analysis of manuscripts; the selection of appropriate reviewers with relevant expertise; identifiable, publicly accountable reviewers; timely reviews, and helpful critical commentary.

What makes a good peer review process?

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

What are the 5 key elements of peer review?

Key points

We have identified five principles of good peer review: Content Integrity, Content Ethics, Fairness, Usefulness, and Timeliness. Journals should prioritize Content Integrity over novelty and citability. Journal teams should make their peer review practices and polices accountable to their stakeholders.

How to Write Effective Peer Review Comments

What is the golden rule of peer review?

Journals have no way to coerce reviewers to return their critiques faster. To greatly shorten the time to publication, all actors in this altruistic network should abide by the Golden Rule of Reviewing: review for others as you would have others review for you.

What are the 7 peer review tips?

What not to do in a peer review?

Reviews that make assumptions about the paper without providing specific feedback are not helpful to the author. Review comments should offer guidance to the authors on how they can broaden their research so it may contribute something to the field. The review comments should give the authors actionable feedback.

What are the three main aims of peer review?

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication.

What are the 3 kinds of peer review?

The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.

What is the biggest strength of peer review?

The major advantage of a peer review process is that peer-reviewed articles provide a trusted form of scientific communication. Since scientific knowledge is cumulative and builds on itself, this trust is particularly important.

What are the core values of peer review?

The IC Director makes final funding decisions, with consideration of staff and Advisory Council/Board advice. The core values of NIH peer review are (1) expert assessment, (2) transparency, (3) impartiality, (4) fairness, (5) confidentiality, (6) security, (7) integrity, and (8) efficiency.

How can peer review be biased?

Peer reviewers can ask authors to delete outcomes, combine outcomes, modify analyses, perform post hoc subgroup analyses, and perform other actions that can, in fact, introduce classical bias.

What is peer review checklist?

There are many different peer review checklists, but the one below should be helpful for your assignment. Is the thesis clear? Does the author use his or her own ideas in the thesis and argument? Is the significance of the problem in the paper explained? Is the significance compelling?

What is the best type of peer review?

Double-anonymous peer review

Many researchers prefer double-anonymous review because they believe it will give their paper a fairer chance than single-anonymous review.

What are the principles of best practice in peer review?

The following good practice should be applied to all reviews: Objectivity, impartiality & integrity: this should be maintained throughout the review process, regardless of the personal or professional bias of the reviewer.

What does a reviewer look for during peer review?

The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.

How should a peer review be structured?

A successful peer review: Contains a brief summary of the entire manuscript. Show the editors and authors what you think the main claims of the paper are, and your assessment of its impact on the field.

What is an example of an effective peer review?

"I appreciate the way you collaborate with your team and cross-functionally to find solutions to problems." "You're an effective team member, as demonstrated by your willingness to help out and contribute as required." "Sarah is a true team player who always helps out her colleagues.

How long should a peer review be?

Difficulty in finding appropriate reviewers. Delayed response from reviewers. Unhelpful review reports – reviews that are a single sentence or paragraph are unhelpful to authors or editors. A normal review report should be two to three pages in length, sometimes longer.

Is peer review ethical?

Peer review is critical to maintaining the quality of science; there is therefore an ethical imperative for scientists to participate in this process when they are able to do so.

How do you disagree with a peer review?

If you don't agree with their critiques, take the time to justify why – respectfully. This may require additional research to put forward a convincing case. “If I decide not to do what a reviewer has suggested, I always check in the literature and then write a really robust justification,” says Shapiro.

How do you avoid bias in a peer review?

While increasing transparency is one way to reduce bias, another approach is double-blind peer review. A study suggests that early career researchers tend to prefer double-blind peer review as it can reduce bias against authors with less experience, female authors, or authors from minority groups.

Can peer review reject?

Inadequate data often leads to manuscript rejection during the peer review process, as it indicates that the data collected doesn't convincingly support the conclusions.

Why is peer review difficult?

They will sometimes miss critical information in a paper or have personal biases when reviewing, causing dubious research to sometimes be published. Furthermore, another study shows that there may be a bias in favor of the institutions that the reviewers themselves are affiliated with.