Español

What reason does warren give for making the claim that comparing tangible factors is not enough to evaluate segregation brainly?

Expert-Verified Answer The reason Warren gave for making the claim that compares "tangible factors" is not enough to evaluate segregation is the real impact of racial segregation is emotional damage to minority students.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

What reason does Warren give for making the claim that comparing tangible factors is not enough to evaluate segregation educational and physical FA?

Warren gives the reason that comparing "tangible factors" is not enough to evaluate segregation because Educational and physical facilities themselves are not actually equal.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

What reason does warren give for making the claim that comparing tangible factors brainly?

What reason does Warren give for making the claim that comparing "tangible factors" is not enough to evaluate segregation? The real impact of racial segregation is emotional damage to minority students.
 Takedown request View complete answer on quizlet.com

What reason does Warren give for believing that separate but equal does not give?

Explanation: Justice Warren gives the reason for believing that 'separate but equal' does not give minority children equal educational opportunities as the finding that a sense of inferiority affects the motivation to learn.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

What reason does Warren give for not believing that separate but equal does not give minority children equal educational opportunities?

Warren believes that "separate but equal" does not give minority children equal educational opportunities due to the findings that indicate that a sense of inferiority affects the motivation to learn.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

Cost Segregation and Tangible Property Repair Regulations

What reasons does Warren provide in this passage?

Expert-Verified Answer
  • The policy of segregation increases a sense of inferiority because it is a law.
  • Racially segregated schools take away educational benefits from African Americans.
  • The policy of segregation makes African American children feel inferior.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

What evidence does Justice Warren give for his reason in this passage?

The evidence that Justice Warren give for his reason in this passage is the Logical evidence because Warren is drawing a reasonable conclusion that segregating children is psychologically harmful.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

What was the impact of the Warren Court quizlet?

The Warren Court made some dramatic changes in judicial power and philosophy in the history of the American judiciary, the Court expanded civil rights and liberties, judicial power, and the federal power.
 Takedown request View complete answer on quizlet.com

Which Warren Court case was most impactful and why?

Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 (1954) banned the segregation of public schools. The very first case put Warren's leadership skills to an extraordinary test.
 Takedown request View complete answer on en.wikipedia.org

What were the major impacts of the Warren Court?

To take two examples, the Warren Court ended racial segregation and carved out vital protections for criminal defendants. Its decision striking down segregated schools in Brown v. Board of Education may be the most celebrated decision in Supreme Court history.
 Takedown request View complete answer on supreme.justia.com

What was the main goal of the Warren Court?

Lesson Summary

The Warren Court definition is a U.S. Supreme Court era when Earl Warren was Chief Justice of the Court. Warren wanted to bring about social change and prevent injustice. Warren Court cases are considered to be landmark cases for the role that they played in transforming American society.
 Takedown request View complete answer on study.com

What was Warren's decision?

On May 17, 1954, Chief Justice Earl Warren read the momentous opinion for a unanimous Court: “. . . in the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place.” The Court ruled that segregation in public schools deprives children of “the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth ...
 Takedown request View complete answer on supremecourthistory.org

What was the final result of the Warren Court's decision?

Warren Leads Decision on Brown v. Board of Education. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka that “separate but equal” schools based on race were unconstitutional.
 Takedown request View complete answer on history.com

Why did Chief Justice Warren say about how Miranda's confession was made?

Chief Justice Earl Warren articulated that the court permitted confessions or self-incriminating statements in criminal trials only when suspects issued them deliberately after police inform of their rights. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) included four dissenters and three separate dissenting opinions.
 Takedown request View complete answer on guides.loc.gov

What reasons does warren provide in this passage to support the claim brainly?

Expert-Verified Answer

Warren provided in this passage to support the claim are: The policy of segregation increases a sense of inferiority because it is a law. Racially segregated schools take away educational benefits from Black people.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

Why did Earl Warren believe that separate but equal facilities were bad for a black student's Education Brainly?

Final answer:

Earl Warren believed that segregation in education made Black students feel inferior and hindered their educational development.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

Which statement could best be used as an effective counterclaim to this claim Dred Scott v Sandford?

C. Taney cannot deny Scott citizenship because it is a federal right. The statement that could best be used as an effective counterclaim to this claim is Taney cannot deny Scott citizenship because it is a federal right.
 Takedown request View complete answer on brainly.com

What was the Warren Court and why was it so controversial?

Stone & Strauss: The Warren Court was, of course, criticized for “activism” – for declaring laws unconstitutional. But more recent conservative courts have generally accepted the “activist” decisions: Brown, Loving, Reynolds v Sims (1964), Miranda, Gideon, Griswold, the school prayer cases, the First Amendment cases.
 Takedown request View complete answer on scotusblog.com

What was the largest criticism of the Warren Court?

The Warren Court's vision, at its core, was deeply democratic. The Warren Court's critics, including many sympathetic critics, often portray the Court's members as judicial imperialists who simply took over policymaking from elected representatives.
 Takedown request View complete answer on news.wttw.com

How did the Warren Court bring about social change?

The Warren Court effectively ended racial segregation in U.S. public schools, expanded the constitutional rights of defendants, ensured equal representation in state legislatures, outlawed state-sponsored prayer in public schools, and paved the way for the legalization of abortion.
 Takedown request View complete answer on thoughtco.com

What were 3 important decisions of the Warren Court?

The Warren Court (1953 – 1969)

Notable cases from the Warren Court include Brown v. Board of Education (equal protection), Gideon v. Wainwright (criminal trials), Reynolds v. Sims (elections), and Miranda v.
 Takedown request View complete answer on supreme.justia.com

What did key decisions made during the era of the Warren Court ensure?

Perhaps the most celebrated decision of the Warren Court, Brown v. Board of Education, signaled the beginning of the end for racial segregation in American public schools. Challenging the “separate but equal” doctrine established by Plessy v.
 Takedown request View complete answer on socialstudieshelp.com

Why did Chief Justice Warren wanted a unanimous decision?

Warren said it had to be unanimous to show there was no division on the Court because the country was divided on the issue of segregation in public schools.
 Takedown request View complete answer on quora.com

Who was the first woman to sit on the Supreme Court?

Sandra Day O'Connor: First Woman on the Supreme Court - Appointment to the Supreme Court.
 Takedown request View complete answer on supremecourt.gov

What was the difference between the Warren Court and the Burger Court?

The Burger Court had a less generous interpretation of the protections offered by the Fourth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment than those of the Warren Court, but the Burger Court did not overrule any of the major precedents set by the Warren Court.
 Takedown request View complete answer on en.wikipedia.org