What was the Supreme Court decision in the Harvard and University of North Carolina cases?

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (“UNC”) violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VI”) by impermissibly using race in their undergraduate admissions processes.

What was the Supreme Court decision on Harvard and UNC?

21-707, holding that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard and UNC violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. As described below, the immediate impact of this decision is largely confined to higher education.

What was the decision on the Harvard Court case?

Harvard, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court held that race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions processes violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

What was the outcome of the Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard?

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court held that race-conscious affirmative action, that is, the consideration of an applicant's race as one factor in making an admissions decision particularly to realize the educational benefits of diversity, is unconstitutional. The decision overturned 45 years of legal precedent.

What was the Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action?

The court's 6-3 ruling in June prohibits all colleges in the country from using race as a consideration in admissions. California's public universities have not used affirmative action for almost 30 years, but some of the state's selective private colleges, and many out-of-state public universities, have relied on ...

Breaking down the Supreme Court's ruling ending affirmative action in college admissions

What happened to the Harvard affirmative action case?

In a decision upending more than four decades of precedent, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, sparking concerns about far-reaching consequences for institutions of higher education across the nation.

What does the Supreme Court decision mean for college admissions?

November 7, 2023. Key takeaways: The Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA) ruling means most colleges that previously considered race in admissions—mostly highly-selective colleges—will need to revise their admissions practices.

What was the result of students for fair admissions v university of north carolina?

The outcome : The court reversed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit in a 6-3 ruling, holding that "Harvard's and UNC's admissions programs violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." Justice Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the majority opinion of the court.

What was the outcome of the Student for Fair Admissions v University of North Carolina?

Holding: The admissions programs at Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Judgment: Reversed, 6-3, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 29, 2023. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.

What was the decision in students for fair admissions inc v university of north carolina?

The University of North Carolina admissions program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The University of North Carolina admissions program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Chief Justice John Roberts authored the 6-3 majority opinion.

Who is suing Harvard and UNC?

Students for Fair Admissions, led by long-time affirmative action critic Edward Blum, sued both Harvard and UNC, and ask the Supreme Court to overrule its prior decisions and hold that the consideration of race as part of a holistic college admissions process in order to achieve a diverse student body violates the ...

What is the name of the Supreme Court case against Harvard University?

Case Background

UNC Chapel-Hill and SFFA v. Harvard were both filed in 2014, and seek to eradicate over 40 years of established legal precedent allowing colleges to consider the race of highly-qualified applicants in admissions to promote the benefits of diverse learning environments.

How did Harvard respond to the affirmative action decision?

Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.” In a statement responding to the decision, Harvard leaders said they believe the institution's academic excellence is improved by the debate and differences of opinion that can come from diversity.

What was the Supreme Court decision on the University of North Carolina?

In July 2022, a Supreme Court order reversed a previous decision to consolidate the two cases, which were heard separately in oral arguments in October 2022. Our need-blind approach to undergraduate admissions reflects the University's core values including a deep commitment to accessibility and affordability.

Why did the Supreme Court rule against Harvard and UNC?

In the UNC case, this Court granted certiorari before judgment. Held: Harvard's and UNC's admissions programs violate the Equal Pro- tection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

What is UNC being sued for?

Students for Fair Admissions accused UNC of showing bias against white and Asian American applicants, alleging unlawful preferential treatment for underrepresented Black and Hispanic applicants.

Why is students for fair admissions suing Harvard?

In November 2014, an organization created by anti-race conscious admissions activist Edward Blum calling itself Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued Harvard, alleging that the University discriminates against Asian-Americans and seeking to prevent Harvard College and other colleges and universities from using a ...

When did University of North Carolina admit black students?

Carolina's black pioneers

Harvey Beech, James Lassiter, J. Kenneth Lee, Floyd McKissick and James Robert Walker enrolled in the UNC School of Law in 1951, following a court order that said the Law School must admit black students. They became the first African American students at Carolina.

Which Supreme Court cases challenged affirmative action in college admissions?

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision addressing the legality of race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions programs in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) v. President & Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard) and SFFA v. University of North Carolina (UNC), Nos.

What is the paper class scandal at UNC?

On October 22, 2014, the report was released reporting that for 18 years, at least 3,100 students enrolled in what were described as "paper" classes, which were independent study classes that had no faculty involvement.

What is the goal of students for fair admissions?

Students for Fair Admissions establishes Equal Protection Clause and Title VI jurisprudence that will require many colleges and universities to review their processes for student admissions, and perhaps for other areas of institutional operations.

What did the Supreme Court hold about an admissions programs in the case of the university of California Board of Regents v Bakke?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a 1978 Supreme Court case which held that a university's admissions criteria which used race as a definite and exclusive basis for an admission decision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

What was the Supreme Court decision on the university of Michigan's admissions procedures?

The Court held that a student admissions process that favors "underrepresented minority groups" did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause so long as it took into account other factors evaluated on an individual basis for every applicant.

How will the end of affirmative action affect college admissions?

The SAT and ACT will be further de-emphasized, with more institutions adopting test-blind policies. Geography and college essays will play a larger role in admissions decisions. Minority students will see a big drop in admissions chances at selective colleges, while Asian and White students will see a modest increase.