What's a good impact factor?

In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. The very prestigious journal Nature had an impact factor of 69.504 in the year 2021.

Is 2.5 a high impact factor?

The majority of journals, in fact, fall in the bracket of an IF of 1-1+. So, a journal with an IF of 2-2.5 would be considered having a higher impact than these journals. A journal with an IF of 5 or above would be considered high-impact, but note that these would be fewer in number.

Is 1.9 a good impact factor?

In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1.

Is 2.7 a good impact factor?

In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1.

Is impact factor 10 good?

An impact factor of 10 can be considered excellent – although unreachable in many categories – as in 2020 only 3.65% of the journals had an impact factor of 10 or higher. An impact factor of 10 isn't even the highest score though.

Is it important to publish in high impact-factor journals? Brian Kobilka

Is it good to publish in a journal without impact factor?

Whether or not an open access journal has an Impact Factor can't be taken as the sole indicator of its quality or prestige. However, we know from our researcher survey (p. 9) that the Impact Factor is an important consideration for many when choosing which journal to publish in.

What is a good h-index for a journal?

What is a Good H-Index? Hirsch reckons that after 20 years of research, an h-index of 20 is good, 40 is outstanding, and 60 is truly exceptional.

Is 7 a good impact factor?

In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1. This is a rule of thumb.

Does impact factor really matter?

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation.

Why is impact factor flawed?

JIF is an aggregate value calculated based on citations of the individual articles in a journal. But because citation counts are highly variable among articles, JIF cannot tell us anything about the quality of any given individual article.

Is 2.6 a good impact factor?

The distribution is highly skewed, with the majority of journals having an impact factor of less than 5, and only a few having an impact factor of more than 20, such as Nature, Science, and Cell. The median is 2.6. So if you see a journal with impact factor 2.6, it's actualy better than 50% of the journals.

Is a low impact factor good?

So, by that logic, the higher the impact factor, the better the journal, right? Well, it's not that simple. In principle, a higher IF is better than a lower IF, but there are many conditions, variations, and other issues to consider. There's no single determinant of what makes a good journal impact factor.

What is a good h-index after 30 years?

h index of 60 after 20 years, or 90 after 30 years, characterizes truly unique individuals.

Is 4 a good impact factor?

In most fields, the journals with impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 and above is considered as good.

How do you know if a journal is good to publish?

Transparency from the journal as to its aim and scope, the editorial board, indexing status, the peer review process, reputation, and policies for authors are among the key indicators of quality journals. These criteria can help identify quality journals suitable for publication.

Why do journals reject papers?

Such problems may include the following: – the paper describes a poorly conducted study; – the research conducted was inadequate; – the literature review is inadequate; – the paper has methodological problems; – the sample is problematic (i.e. too small in size, self-selected etc.)

Is Frontiers a predatory publisher?

In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall, though Beall's list was taken offline two years later in a decision that remains controversial.

What is the rejection rate for Frontiers?

Rejection rates in Frontiers journals are around ~27% for submissions outside of research topics, most manuscripts are published within 3 months of submission, and yet, Frontiers citations rates are amongst the very highest when compared to journals in the same categories.

Is PLoS predatory?

No, PLoS One is definitely NOT a predatory journal. It is different from other academic journals, in that the explicit goal is for submissions to be reviewed for rigor rather than for impact or citability.

What is a Tier 1 academic journal?

Tier 1: Peer-reviewed academic publications. Tier 2: Reports, articles, and books from credible non-academic sources. Tier 3. Short pieces from periodicals or credible websites. Tier 4.