Why are you not allowed to cite Wikipedia as research in your speeches?

Most academics agree that you shouldn't cite Wikipedia as a source in your academic writing, and universities often have rules against doing so. This is partly because of concerns about its reliability, and partly because it's a tertiary source.

Why can't you cite Wikipedia as a source in a research?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect.

How do you cite Wikipedia in a speech?

A Wikipedia citation usually includes the title of the article, “Wikipedia” and/or “Wikimedia Foundation,” the date the article was last updated, and the URL. In APA Style, you'll give the URL of the current revision of the article so that you're sure the reader accesses the same version as you.

Why is Wikipedia against primary sources?

Policy: Unless restricted by another policy, Primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation.

Is it OK to cite an image from Wikipedia?

While not explicitly prohibiting citations of images, the Manual of Style for captions states "Unless relevant to the subject, do not credit the image author or copyright holder in the article." Wikipedia:Citing sources notes that "For an image or other media file, details of its origin and copyright status should ...

How to cite Wikipedia in your reference list: APA 7th edition tutorial

Can I use a Wikipedia image in my thesis?

You can use images that are freely-licensed images, provided you comply with the individual image's license terms. While all article text is licensed under the GFDL, free images have several free content licenses to choose from. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses for the many possibilities.

Is Wikipedia in the public domain?

Wikipedia's textual content is copyrighted, but you may reuse it under the terms of our licensing requirements, summarized below.

Is Wikipedia a credible source for academic research?

Most academics agree that you shouldn't cite Wikipedia as a source in your academic writing, and universities often have rules against doing so. This is partly because of concerns about its reliability, and partly because it's a tertiary source.

Is Wikipedia a reliable secondary source?

Wikipedia is a tertiary source. Wikipedia cannot cite itself as a source—that would be a self-reference. (However, when writing in the summary style detailed referencing may only be necessary in the subarticle and not the summary.)

What are the acceptable sources for Wikipedia?

Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates to or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks, almanacs, and encyclopedias, may be cited.

Can I cite Wikipedia as a source?

We advise special caution when using Wikipedia as a source for research projects. Normal academic usage of Wikipedia is for getting the general facts of a problem and to gather keywords, references and bibliographical pointers, but not as a source in itself. Remember that Wikipedia is a wiki.

Can you cite Wikipedia in MLA?

To cite Wikipedia in MLA on the Works Cited page, follow this formula: "Title of Article." Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Day Mo. Year, URL. Accessed Day Mo.

Is Wikipedia accurate?

Further studies by The Guardian, the Journal of Clinical Oncology, PC Pro, the Canadian Library Association, and Library Journal have all found that Wikipedia is, for the most part, reliable. None of this is to say that Wikipedia is perfect or 100 percent accurate.

Can Wikipedia be used during research?

Wikipedia can be a great tool for learning and researching information. However, as with all tertiary reference works, Wikipedia is not considered to be a reliable source as not everything in Wikipedia is accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased.

How does Wikipedia prevent vandalism?

User registration: Requiring users to register accounts before editing protected pages can act as a deterrent to vandalism. Registered users are often more accountable for their actions. Edit reversion: Wikipedia's "undo" feature allows editors to quickly revert changes, making it relatively easy to correct vandalism.

How do you use Wikipedia properly?

What are two downsides to using Wikipedia?

Is Wikipedia a credible and reliable source to use as a primary source?

While many people read (and edit) Wikipedia, there is no formal review of the articles for fact-checking. In other words, there's no peer review of any of the material on the website. Wikipedia doesn't guarantee any of the information is accurate.

Is .org a reliable source?

Because it is easy for anyone to publish anything on a website, you need to find websites that contain reliable information. Websites with these domains (the URL ending) generally have reliable information: . org (a registered organisation)

What is better than Wikipedia?

Encyclopedia Britannica Online

Wikipedia has grown to overshadow the encyclopedia in the Age of the Internet, but Britannica is still one of the most highly respected reference materials available. Yes, Britannica is a reliable source, and is certainly more reliable than Wikipedia.

Which of the following is not an appropriate source for academic research?

Usually inappropriate: magazines, blogs, and websites

These may include articles in popular magazines or postings in blogs, forums, and other websites. In general, although these sources may be well-written and easy to understand, their scientific value is often not as high as that of peer-reviewed articles.

What is the most reliable source of information?

based on strong evidence.” Widely credible sources include: Scholarly, peer-reviewed articles and books. Trade or professional articles or books. Magazine articles, books and newspaper articles from well-established companies.

Is it legal to use Wikipedia content?

The rule of all the Wikipedias, including this one, is that nothing in the Wikipedia can be copyrighted by someone else. The exception is if Wikipedia editors (including named and unnamed editors) have permission to use it.

Is it legal to copy and paste from Wikipedia?

Wikipedia uses grants free access to our text in the same sense as free software is licensed freely. This principle is known as copyleft. Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and acknowledges the authors of the Wikipedia article used.

Is Wikipedia a free source?

Wikipedia is an example of a global application of the open-source model. Creation for its own sake – For example, Wikipedia editors add content for recreation. Artists have a drive to create. Both communities benefit from free starting material.