Why do people oppose reviewers?

You also might oppose a reviewer because of a personal disagreement, a conflicting approach to your work, or a sense based on past interactions that this person would not comment on your manuscript fairly. For most reasonable requests, that's your business.

What does oppose reviewers mean?

An Opposed Reviewer is someone who an author does not want to have review his/her manuscript. There is no master list from which authors can select eligible reviewers.

How do you oppose a reviewer?

How to Oppose Reviewers. As an author, just as you may be asked to submit a list of potential reviewers, many journals will ask you to indicate who you may want to oppose as a reviewer due to a conflict of interest, or some other reason. So, you'll need to gather their contact details, as well.

Why do reviewers decline to review?

The most frequent reasons for declining to review were lack of time (46%) and lack of expertise (35%).

How do you respectfully disagree with a reviewer?

How do you treat opposed reviewers? | Cell Mentor

How do you respond to a rude reviewer?

Remember that you need to be polite, even when reviewers are rude. However, if you feel the reviewer has any conflict of interest, malicious intent, or discriminatory attitude, you can report that to the editor-in-chief in a separate letter.

How do you respond to a comment you disagree with?

What is the rejection rate for peer review?

Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on.

How do you deal with reviewers?

Why can peer review be bad?

They will sometimes miss critical information in a paper or have personal biases when reviewing, causing dubious research to sometimes be published. Furthermore, another study shows that there may be a bias in favor of the institutions that the reviewers themselves are affiliated with.

How do you deal with a difficult reviewer?

Do reviewers have a responsibility?

Reviewers have the responsibility to identify strengths and provide constructive comments to help the author resolve weaknesses in the work. A reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the author.

What is reviewer misconduct?

Reviewers are expected to perform the review of the work themselves, unless they are participating in co-review. Submitting a review in the name of another person (real or fictional) is misconduct and will not be tolerated.

What does it mean when you oppose someone?

to disagree with something or someone, and speak or take action against them: Most local residents opposed the building of the shopping mall.

What is the response to reviewers rebuttal?

Provide point-by-point responses: Number the reviewers' points and respond to them sequentially. Highlight the corresponding changes in the manuscript or refer to the line numbers in the original and revised manuscripts. Consider setting the reviewer comments in bold to distinguish them from your responses.

Who should I suggest as reviewer?

Look for people who have published papers in the same field as your submitted paper! You want a reviewer to have sound knowledge on your paper topic and he/she should know how journals work. Therefore, suggest other researchers who have done and published research in the same field.

What do reviewers look for?

Reviewers look for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness of the manuscript that can greatly affect the chances of publishing your research. Apart from these, reviewers check for the scientific merits of the manuscript, its methods, and research misconduct (if any).

Should you acknowledge reviewers?

This habit is seen as good academic practice and courtesy. Authors show their gratitude to those reviewers because their comments improved the paper, and therefore they deserve the acknowledgment.

Can you sue a reviewer?

Suing someone for leaving a bad review is legally possible but challenging, as it requires proving false statements made with malicious intent or reckless disregard for the truth. Distinguishing between opinions and false factual claims is crucial in assessing the legality of suing for a bad review.

What is the golden rule of peer review?

Journals have no way to coerce reviewers to return their critiques faster. To greatly shorten the time to publication, all actors in this altruistic network should abide by the Golden Rule of Reviewing: review for others as you would have others review for you.

Is being a peer reviewer prestigious?

Journal editors select peer reviewers for their knowledge of a particular field. Thus peer reviewers are perceived as experts and being associated with prestigious journals as peer reviewer is considered an accomplishment for any researcher.

Is peer review in crisis?

As long as we continue to chug within the current system, we will continue to have a problem with peer review. There are too many journals. This structural problem is not as often recognized and discussed, but we just keep on birthing journals.

What is a nice way to say I disagree?

How can you politely say “We disagree”? "I see your point, but I have a different perspective." "I understand where you're coming from, but I respectfully disagree." "While I respect your opinion, I hold a different view on this matter."

How do you respond without agreeing or disagreeing?

Use descriptive language, such as “I hear you. You're upset because it seems I wasn't mindful of the time” rather than judgmental language. Seek clarification. Ask questions to make sure you're hearing what the other person intended.

How to respectfully disagree with someone in a discussion post?

Respectfully Disagreeing – “No, because…”

It's okay to respectfully disagree with someone's post, but it's important to show that you appreciate the post. Be sure not to attack the writer, and avoid using emotional appeals. Instead, focus on the logic:Do the causes and effects as explained relate to one another?