Why not use peer-reviewed articles?

A major criticism of peer review is that there is little evidence that the process actually works, that it is actually an effective screen for good quality scientific work, and that it actually improves the quality of scientific literature.

Is it OK to use non peer-reviewed articles?

Avoid such references if possible. You should primarily focus on peer-reviewed journal articles as sources for your research paper. High quality research papers typically do not rely on non-academic and not peer-reviewed sources.

Is a peer-reviewed article unreliable?

Peer-reviewed articles provide a trusted form of scientific communication. Peer-reviewed work isn't necessarily correct or conclusive, but it does meet the standards of science.

What is the misuse of peer review?

Abuse of peer review

You can steal ideas and present them as your own, or produce an unjustly harsh review to block or at least slow down the publication of the ideas of a competitor.

Is a peer reviewed journal article a credible source Why or why not?

Peer reviewed articles are often considered the most reliable and reputable sources in that field of study. Peer reviewed articles have undergone review (hence the "peer-review") by fellow experts in that field, as well as an editorial review process.

How Do I Know if Articles Are Scholarly or Peer-Reviewed? (Library Research Skills Tutorial)

What are the disadvantages of peer review?

Why is peer-reviewed information not reliable?

Evidence from a peer-reviewed article does not make it reliable, based only on that fact. For example, there is evidence suggesting poor interrater agreement among peer-reviewers, with a strong bias against manuscripts that report results against reviewers' theoretical perspectives [5].

Can peer reviewed articles be biased?

Peer review is the major method used by the scientific community to evaluate manuscripts and decide what is suitable for publication. However, this process in its current design is not bulletproof and is prone to reviewer and editorial bias.

Why is peer review biased?

TYPES OF BIAS IN THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS

It can occur when a reviewer is competing with the author for a certain position or honor. If a reviewer knows something about the author's work, they might extrapolate from previous impressions to the work being considered now.

Is peer review ethical?

Peer review is critical to maintaining the quality of science; there is therefore an ethical imperative for scientists to participate in this process when they are able to do so.

What is the problem with peer-reviewed?

Potential problems of peer review

Because of how overwhelming the review process can be, the results are not always consistent between different articles and journals. Particularly, the decisions of reviewers can be inconsistent.

Does peer review increase bias?

The peer review process can also introduce bias. A compelling ethical and moral rationale necessitates improving the peer review process. A double-blind peer review system is supported on equipoise and fair-play principles. Triple- and quadruple-blind systems have also been described but are not commonly used.

Are peer reviewed sources more reliable?

Journals which have a peer review process are generally considered more reliable than other journals. All articles submitted to a peer reviewed journal are checked by other experts in the field before they are published.

How do you avoid bias in a peer review?

While increasing transparency is one way to reduce bias, another approach is double-blind peer review. A study suggests that early career researchers tend to prefer double-blind peer review as it can reduce bias against authors with less experience, female authors, or authors from minority groups.

Does peer-reviewed mean accurate?

Peer-reviewing helps insure that articles provide accurate, verifiable, and valuable contributions to a field of study. The peer-review process is anonymous, to prevent personal biases and favoritism from affecting the outcomes. Reviewers read manuscripts that omit the names of the author(s).

What are the pros and cons of peer reviewed journals?

Pros: The articles in scholarly journals go through a peer review process, which means they have been checked over and given a stamp of approval by experts and scholars of a field. Cons: Articles in scholarly articles are not geared toward general interests; they are more focused on academic topics.

What is better than peer review?

Editorial Control

As an alternative, the publisher can rely on an editorial process whereby experts recommend which works to publish. The editors act as a filter, selecting the materials to publish and often working with authors on the details of their work.

What is the main difference between scholarly articles and peer-reviewed articles?

In short, “scholarly” means the article was written by an expert for an audience of other experts, researchers or students. “Peer-reviewed” takes it one step further and means the article was reviewed and critiqued by the author's peers who are experts in the same subject area.

How do you know peer-reviewed articles are credible over other sources?

Author expertise: Check the credentials of the author and whether they have a relevant background or experience in the field. Peer-review: Check if the article has been peer-reviewed by experts in the field. Peer-reviewed articles undergo a rigorous review process to ensure accuracy and credibility.

Is a peer-reviewed article a high quality source of information?

Peer-reviewed (refereed or scholarly) journals - Articles are written by experts and are reviewed by several other experts in the field before the article is published in the journal in order to ensure the article's quality. (The article is more likely to be scientifically valid, reach reasonable conclusions, etc.)

What are the ethical guidelines for peer review?

Disclosing all conflict of interest, maintaining confidentiality, attributing proper credit to all reviewers, providing constructive criticism and displaying courtesy are key components of ethical peer review. Peer review assesses the science behind the research study and manuscript.

Is peer review infallible?

Peer review is not without flaws. Those who evaluate papers are not infallible and often work under time constraints that militate against perfection. Sometimes the person selected by the editor is not the perfect match for the topic under review.

Why is peer review confidential?

During grant and manuscript reviews, confidentiality helps protect ideas before they are funded or published. In personnel reviews, confidentiality is important to protect personal privacy. Peer reviewers have an obligation to preserve confidentiality during the review process if they have been asked to do so.

What is the gold standard for peer review?

The peer review is the key process to evaluate and validate the research that increase the overall quality of the journal.. Superficial and poor quality peer reviewing process does not identify the misconduct and ethical issues raised by the research. Peer review system is the gold standard to review an article.

What is the most important rule of peer review?

General comments to the authors

Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.