How many reviewers usually see a paper Frontiers?

Most article types require at least two reviewers to complete a review. These reviewers can either be invited from the board of review editors or appropriately recruited among experts in the field. It is the prerogative of a handling editor to manage the reviewer recommendations of a manuscript.

How many reviewers usually see a paper?

A minimum of two independent reviewers is normally required for every research article. The aims and scope of each journal will outline their peer review policy in detail. The reviewers will be asked to read and comment on your article.

What is the rejection rate for Frontiers?

Rejection rates in Frontiers journals are around ~27% for submissions outside of research topics, most manuscripts are published within 3 months of submission, and yet, Frontiers citations rates are amongst the very highest when compared to journals in the same categories.

How many reviewers usually see a paper springer?

All research articles, and most other article types, published in Springer journals undergo peer review. This usually involves review by at least two independent, expert peer reviewers.

Do editors of Frontiers get paid?

Chief editors receive an honorarium if their section or field reaches certain submission levels and for their editorial project work. The honorarium is not based on the number of accepted articles, ensuring that editors have no incentive to accept manuscripts.

How to suggest reviewers for your journal paper

Is Frontiers predatory or not?

All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. Based on a series of information published here, we decided to include the Frontiers Media journals on the predatory publications list.

Is Frontiers a prestigious journal?

Frontiers is the 3rd most-cited and 6th largest research publisher. We publish groundbreaking discoveries by the world's top experts. Scientists empower society and our mission is to accelerate scientific discovery by making science open.

Does reviewers assigned mean under review?

Answer: The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent out for review.

How long does it take to find reviewers?

The peer review process starts when the suitable reviewers accept the journal's invitation to review. Depending on the specific subject area of your study and the availability of the reviewers, this process may take few days to start. Sometimes, this period may extend to 2-3 weeks.

How many reviewers usually see a paper in Elsevier?

Most papers receive feedback from three peer reviewers. Shorter papers, such as brief reports or current issues, may receive feedback from two peer reviewers. Some journal submissions such as commentaries and book reviews are reviewed by AJPM editors and do not undergo external peer review.

Is Frontiers high impact?

Highly visible, highly cited research

In 2023, Frontiers articles were viewed and downloaded 687 million times across the world, totalling more than 2.5 billion overall. Article citations also increased, totalling 7.2 million citations.

What is the acceptance rate for Frontiers journals?

The definition of journal acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to Frontiers in Psychology that was accepted for publication. Based on the Journal Acceptance Rate Feedback System database, the latest acceptance rate of Frontiers in Psychology is 86.4%.

How long does Frontiers take to publish?

It takes roughly 1-2 weeks from the acceptance of your article for your Author's Proof to be created by our typesetting team. Once you have approved the Author's Proof, it takes a further 1-2 weeks for us to implement any corrections, finalize the production process, and publish your article.

How many peer reviewers are usually invited to review a paper?

The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of reviewers is secured– commonly this is 2, but there is some variation between journals.

How long should you spend reviewing a paper?

As a rule of thumb, I try to read the paper and draft a review over the course of an hour or so, then I put the paper aside for a few days and come back to it with fresh eyes and spend a little while considering my comments and making sure I still agree with myself.

How many papers should I review per year?

Journals typically require two or three reviewers per paper, and scientists do four to five reviews a year on average¹, although some perform many more, according to Publons. They're generally expected to fold reviewing into their academic workloads.

What if a journal can't find reviewers?

Some journals ask authors to provide a list of potential peer reviewers; however they must not be from the same institution/research group as the author and they must not have published together—this must be made clear in the instructions to authors information.

How do journals choose reviewers?

Why do reviewers decline to review?

The most frequent reasons for declining to review were lack of time (46%) and lack of expertise (35%).

Can a paper be rejected after under review?

However, it's very common for papers to be rejected; studies have shown that around 21% of papers are rejected without review, while approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review.

Can reviewers reject a manuscript?

Your manuscript can be rejected for many reasons but these can generally be divided into technical and editorial reasons. Technical reasons usually require more work such as further experiments or analysis before your work can be published. Technical reasons for rejection include: Incomplete data.

Can a paper under review be rejected?

Many papers that reach the review stage are rejected because although their hypothesis is clear and the study is well designed, the conclusions made do not have enough data to make the case. Perhaps the sample size or patient data set is too small to yield statistically significant results.

Is Frontiers better than MDPI?

Frontiers, same but different

There are some differences though. For example, Frontiers publishes papers fast, but slower than MDPI, it has a higher reliance on the Chinese market than MDPI, it charges higher APCs than MDPI, and its journals are slightly better ranked than those of MDPI.

How do you become a reviewer in Frontiers?

Our qualifications and requirements for a potential reviewer are as follows: A minimum of 3 years research or professional experience in the relevant field of the applied journal. A minimum of 3 publications on the same topic as the applied journal. Priority will be given to applicants who hold doctoral degrees.

What is the word limit for Frontiers journal?

Editorial articles may contain 1 Figure and have a word count of 1,000 for Topics with 5-10 articles. The word limit can be increased for each additional article in the Topic, up to a maximum of 5,000 words for 50 articles or more.